feature(coverage): support minimum coverage thresholds #1052
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5f29c12 to
9852ebf
Compare
9852ebf to
02124ed
Compare
|
@isaacs are there any changes you'd like me to make to this? Is there anything else I can do to help move this forward? I appreciate you taking a look. I took the command line switch descriptions from previous versions of node-tap where min coverage was supported and updated the relevant docs that I could find. Are there any other places or docs that I need to update? |
|
@isaacs bump |
|
@isaacs are you interested in "passing the torch" to one or more developers to keep this project actively maintained? Or perhaps you're interested in archiving/deprecating the project? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are many, I assume, that would like to continue using node-tap, and keep their dependencies updated, but either aren't ready for, or don't wish to subscribe to, 100% code coverage philosophy/ideology. This PR addresses this by "bringing back" minimum code coverage thresholds.
Please let me know if there is any additional work, or changes, and I'll address the feedback promptly.
Related issues: