[Form] Added a configuration that allow form extra data #9377
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| $context = $this->getMockExecutionContext(); | ||
|
|
||
| $form = $this->getBuilder('parent', null, array('allow_extra_fields'=>true)) | ||
| ->setCompound(true) |
| @@ -615,6 +615,25 @@ public function testViolationIfExtraData() | ||
| $this->validator->validate($form, new Form()); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public function testViolationIfExtraDataAllowed() |
|
Looks good! Symfony 2.4 is already feature-frozen, postponed to 2.5. |
|
Thanks! |
|
Is there any news on this PR (if it could be merged or whatever for 2.5 as @bschussek mentionned it) ? |
|
ping @bschussek |
|
👍 |
|
Also curious about this! |
|
Just realized that this is a duplicate of #8133. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I can not understand how 1099858 can solve #7209 or #7229, so i created this PR.
I can not also understand why #7209 can be considered as duplicate of #1341 (1099858).
The commit 1099858 will solve problem if some fields is missing, but says nothing about extra fields.