-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 93
Tshepo/41/notes #3332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tshepo/41/notes #3332
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit c050725)
WalkthroughThis update changes the type of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant UI as NotesComponent
participant Provider as NotesProvider
participant API as Backend API
UI->>Provider: Pass ownerId, ownerType, category
Provider->>API: Fetch notes with category (string), allCategories flag
API-->>Provider: Return notes with category as string
Provider-->>UI: Supply notes data
UI->>Provider: Create note (category: string, uniqueIdentifier)
Provider->>API: POST note with category (string), uniqueIdentifier
API-->>Provider: Confirmation/created note
Provider-->>UI: Update notes list
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
shesha-reactjs/src/apis/note.ts (1)
23-23
:⚠️ Potential issueInconsistency: Category type not updated in NoteDto.
The
category
property inNoteDto
still showsnumber | null
but according to the AI summary, this should be changed tostring
to align with the backend changes and other interfaces in this file.Apply this diff to fix the type inconsistency:
- category?: number | null; + category?: string;
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/CreateNoteDto.cs (1)
41-41
: Remove unnecessary blank line.Consider removing the extra blank line for better code formatting consistency.
-
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/CreateNoteDto.cs
(2 hunks)shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/GetListInput.cs
(1 hunks)shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/NoteDto.cs
(1 hunks)shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/UpdateNoteDto.cs
(1 hunks)shesha-core/src/Shesha.Core/Domain/Note.cs
(1 hunks)shesha-core/src/Shesha.Core/Migrations/M20250527023700.cs
(1 hunks)shesha-reactjs/src/apis/note.ts
(5 hunks)shesha-reactjs/src/designer-components/notes/notesComponent.tsx
(2 hunks)shesha-reactjs/src/designer-components/notes/settingsForm.json
(2 hunks)shesha-reactjs/src/providers/notes/contexts.ts
(2 hunks)shesha-reactjs/src/providers/notes/index.tsx
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/UpdateNoteDto.cs (1)
12-12
: LGTM: Category type change is consistent with the architectural shift.The change from
int?
tostring?
aligns with the broader refactoring to move from reference-list based categories to direct string categories. The documentation clearly explains the purpose of this property.shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/CreateNoteDto.cs (1)
24-24
: LGTM: Category type change is consistent.The change from
int?
tostring?
is consistent with the overall refactoring across the notes module.shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/NoteDto.cs (1)
30-30
: LGTM: Category type change aligns with domain model refactoring.The change from
int?
tostring?
is consistent with the broader architectural shift mentioned in the summary and aligns with the domain model changes.shesha-core/src/Shesha.Application/Notes/Dto/GetListInput.cs (1)
22-22
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify query performance impact of string-based category filtering.
The change from
int?
tostring?
is consistent with the overall refactoring. However, consider the performance implications when filtering by string categories vs integer categories in database queries.Run the following script to check if there are any database indexes or query optimizations that might need attention:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for database queries and indexes related to Category filtering # Search for Category-related database queries or LINQ expressions rg -A 5 -B 5 "Category.*Where|Where.*Category" --type cs # Search for any existing database indexes or configurations rg -A 3 -B 3 "Index.*Category|Category.*Index" --type cs # Look for any Entity Framework configurations rg -A 5 "Category.*HasIndex|HasIndex.*Category" --type csLength of output: 624
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search all C# files for LINQ filters on Category rg -A 5 -B 5 "\.Where\s*\(.*Category" -g "*.cs" rg -A 5 -B 5 "Category.*Where" -g "*.cs" # Search for EF Core index configurations on Category rg -A 3 -B 3 "HasIndex" -g "*.cs" rg -A 3 -B 3 "\[Index" -g "*.cs"Length of output: 757
Verify database indexing and query performance for string-based Category filtering.
I wasn’t able to locate any LINQ queries or EF Core index configurations targeting the
Category
property in the codebase. Please manually confirm that:
- Repositories or services use efficient
.Where(...)
clauses when filtering byCategory
.- The
Category
column has an appropriate database index (via EF Core’sHasIndex
or[Index]
annotation).- The underlying database schema includes an index on the
Category
field to avoid full-table scans.shesha-reactjs/src/providers/notes/contexts.ts (3)
13-13
: LGTM! Type change aligns with backend modifications.The change from
number
tostring
for the category property correctly reflects the backend domain model update from integer-based reference list to string-based identifier.
22-22
: LGTM! Consistent type change for category property.The category type change in
ICreateNotePayload
maintains consistency with theINoteSettings
interface and backend DTOs.
27-27
: LGTM! Addition of uniqueIdentifier field.The new
uniqueIdentifier
property provides a useful mechanism for tracking the component that created the note.shesha-reactjs/src/designer-components/notes/notesComponent.tsx (2)
22-22
: LGTM! Consistent addition of category property.The addition of the optional
category
string property toINotesProps
aligns perfectly with the backend changes and provides the necessary interface for category-based note grouping.
41-41
: LGTM! Proper prop passing and optional chaining usage.The
NotesProvider
correctly receives thecategory
prop from the model, and the use of optional chaining formodel?.ownerType
andmodel?.category
is good defensive programming practice.shesha-core/src/Shesha.Core/Domain/Note.cs (1)
14-14
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify application-level validation for category values.
The change from integer-based reference list to free-form string removes built-in referential integrity. While this provides more flexibility, it requires careful application-level validation to prevent data inconsistencies.
Please run the following script to verify that proper validation is implemented in the application layer:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for category validation in DTOs and application services # Expected: Find validation logic or constraints for category values echo "=== Searching for category validation in DTOs ===" rg -A 3 -B 3 "Category.*validation|validation.*Category" --type cs echo "=== Searching for category validation attributes ===" rg -A 2 -B 2 "\[.*Category.*\]|\[.*StringLength.*\].*Category" --type cs echo "=== Searching in Notes application services ===" rg -A 5 -B 5 "Category" --type cs --glob "**/Notes/**" echo "=== Checking for category-related constants or enums ===" rg -A 3 -B 3 "NoteType|NoteCategory|CategoryType" --type csLength of output: 1308
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Broader search for Category usage and validation in C# files echo "=== All occurrences of 'Category' in C# files ===" rg -n "Category" --glob '*.cs' echo -e "\n=== DataAnnotation attributes on Category ===" rg -n "\[(Required|StringLength|RegularExpression).*Category" --glob '*.cs' echo -e "\n=== FluentValidation rules for Category ===" rg -n "RuleFor.*Category" --glob '*.cs'Length of output: 922
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Inspect repository structure and locate C# files echo "=== Top-level contents ===" ls -1 echo -e "\n=== Directory tree (depth 3) ===" find . -maxdepth 3 -type d echo -e "\n=== First 20 .cs files ===" find . -type f | grep '\.cs$' | head -20Length of output: 475
Verify application-level validation for Category values
Our automated searches didn’t locate any DataAnnotations or FluentValidation rules enforcing valid values for the new string-typed Category on the Note entity. Please manually confirm that:
- DTOs or view models include appropriate validation attributes (e.g. [StringLength], [RegularExpression], or [Required]) on Category
- Application services or validators (e.g. FluentValidation) enforce a whitelist of allowed category values
- Any constants or enums used for valid categories are applied consistently wherever Category is set or persisted
Without these safeguards, moving from an integer‐based reference list to a free-form string risks data inconsistencies. Ensure your application layer properly validates and constrains Category before merging.
shesha-reactjs/src/designer-components/notes/settingsForm.json (2)
37-44
: LGTM: Category field addition aligns with type changes.The addition of the "Notes Category" text field is well-structured and aligns with the broader changes to support string-based categories instead of numeric ones. The field includes proper labeling and helpful description.
159-162
: LGTM: Required validation for essential fields.Adding required validation to both
ownerId
andownerType
fields is appropriate since these are essential for note ownership and proper categorization in the system.Also applies to: 169-172
shesha-reactjs/src/providers/notes/index.tsx (4)
41-41
: LGTM: Logical category filtering implementation.The
shouldShowAllCategories
computation correctly implements the logic: show all categories when no specific category is provided OR when explicitly requested via theallCategories
prop.
60-60
: LGTM: Consistent use of computed flag.Good refactoring to use the computed
shouldShowAllCategories
flag consistently across both the settings action and query parameters.Also applies to: 70-70
136-138
: LGTM: Proper category inheritance for new notes.The logic correctly ensures that new notes inherit the provider's category when not explicitly specified, maintaining consistency with the categorization system.
35-36
:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify the breaking change in default behavior.
Changing the default value of
allCategories
fromtrue
tofalse
is a breaking change that could affect existing implementations. This means components that previously showed all categories by default will now show only category-specific notes.Please verify that this behavioral change is intentional and that existing usages have been updated accordingly:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for NotesProvider usage without explicit allCategories prop rg -A 10 -B 5 "NotesProvider" --type tsx --type ts | grep -v "allCategories"Length of output: 102
To ensure we catch all
.ts
and.tsx
usages (sincerg
didn’t recognizetsx
), let’s fall back togrep
:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all NotesProvider usages in .ts/.tsx files without an explicit allCategories prop grep -R "NotesProvider" -n . --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" | grep -v "allCategories"Length of output: 87
Let’s widen the search to include JS/JSX as well and drop the built-in type filter:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search across .ts, .tsx, .js, .jsx for NotesProvider without allCategories rg --glob '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -n 'NotesProvider' . | grep -v 'allCategories'Length of output: 74
Let’s specifically look for JSX usages of
<NotesProvider>
to see if any omit theallCategories
prop:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search TSX/JSX for NotesProvider usage without allCategories rg --glob '*.{tsx,jsx}' '<NotesProvider' -n . | grep -v 'allCategories'Length of output: 71
Verify explicit
allCategories
on all NotesProvider usagesI didn’t find any
<NotesProvider>
instances missing an explicitallCategories
prop via automated search, but absence of evidence isn’t proof of absence. Please manually verify that every use of<NotesProvider>
in the codebase setsallCategories
(or add it where needed) to prevent unintended breaking changes.shesha-reactjs/src/apis/note.ts (2)
37-40
: LGTM: Consistent uniqueIdentifier field addition.The addition of the
uniqueIdentifier
property across all related interfaces (NoteDto, CreateNoteDto, NoteGetListQueryParams) is well-documented and consistent. This will help track which component created each note.Also applies to: 69-72, 96-99
56-56
: LGTM: Category type updated to string.The category type changes in
CreateNoteDto
andNoteGetListQueryParams
correctly align with the backend type changes from numeric to string-based categories.Also applies to: 87-87
public override void Down() | ||
{ | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement proper rollback logic in Down() method.
The empty Down() method prevents rollback of this migration, which is a critical issue for database maintainability.
Apply this diff to add rollback capability:
public override void Down()
{
+ Rename.Column("Category").OnTable("Core_Notes").To("CategoryLkp");
+
+ Alter.Table("Core_Notes")
+ .AlterColumn("CategoryLkp")
+ .AsInt32()
+ .Nullable();
}
Note: Rolling back after data has been converted to strings may result in data loss if the string values cannot be converted back to valid integers.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
public override void Down() | |
{ | |
} | |
public override void Down() | |
{ | |
Rename.Column("Category").OnTable("Core_Notes").To("CategoryLkp"); | |
Alter.Table("Core_Notes") | |
.AlterColumn("CategoryLkp") | |
.AsInt32() | |
.Nullable(); | |
} |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In shesha-core/src/Shesha.Core/Migrations/M20250527023700.cs at lines 22 to 24,
the Down() method is empty, preventing rollback of the migration. Implement the
Down() method to reverse the changes made in the Up() method, restoring the
database schema and data to its previous state. Be cautious that rolling back
after converting data to strings may cause data loss if the strings cannot be
converted back to integers; handle this appropriately in the rollback logic.
Alter.Table("Core_Notes") | ||
.AlterColumn("CategoryLkp") | ||
.AsString(50) | ||
.Nullable(); | ||
|
||
Rename.Column("CategoryLkp").OnTable("Core_Notes").To("Category"); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add data conversion logic and rollback capability.
The migration alters the column type from integer to string without handling existing data conversion, which could cause data loss or migration failures.
Apply this diff to add proper data handling:
public override void Up()
{
+ // First, create a backup of existing data if any exists
+ Execute.Sql(@"
+ IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Core_Notes WHERE CategoryLkp IS NOT NULL)
+ BEGIN
+ -- Add temporary column to store converted values
+ ALTER TABLE Core_Notes ADD CategoryLkp_Backup VARCHAR(50)
+
+ -- Convert existing integer values to strings
+ UPDATE Core_Notes
+ SET CategoryLkp_Backup = CAST(CategoryLkp AS VARCHAR(50))
+ WHERE CategoryLkp IS NOT NULL
+ END
+ ");
+
Alter.Table("Core_Notes")
.AlterColumn("CategoryLkp")
.AsString(50)
.Nullable();
+ Execute.Sql(@"
+ -- Copy converted data back if backup exists
+ IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.columns WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID('Core_Notes') AND name = 'CategoryLkp_Backup')
+ BEGIN
+ UPDATE Core_Notes
+ SET CategoryLkp = CategoryLkp_Backup
+ WHERE CategoryLkp_Backup IS NOT NULL
+
+ -- Drop backup column
+ ALTER TABLE Core_Notes DROP COLUMN CategoryLkp_Backup
+ END
+ ");
+
Rename.Column("CategoryLkp").OnTable("Core_Notes").To("Category");
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In shesha-core/src/Shesha.Core/Migrations/M20250527023700.cs around lines 15 to
21, the migration changes the "CategoryLkp" column from integer to string but
lacks data conversion logic and rollback support. To fix this, add code to
convert existing integer data to string format before altering the column type,
ensuring no data loss. Also, implement a Down() method to revert the column
changes and rename, restoring the original schema and data type to support
rollback.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements