[misc] storage bug fixes and code clean up #265
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @slin1237, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on improving the robustness and maintainability of the storage provider implementations, specifically for OCI and S3. It resolves identified bugs related to object listing and pagination, and streamlines code by removing redundant helpers and leveraging standard library functions for common tasks like content type detection.
Highlights
- OCI Storage Provider Improvements: Removed unused helper functions and corrected content type handling during object listing for OCI storage.
- S3 Storage Provider Enhancements: Addressed a pagination issue in the S3 List operation and refactored content type detection to use the standard mime package for better accuracy and maintainability.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several bug fixes and code cleanups across the OCI and S3 storage providers. The changes include correcting a pagination issue in the S3 List function, fixing an incorrect content type assignment in the OCI List function, and refactoring the content type detection logic in the S3 provider to use the standard mime package. Additionally, an unused helper file for the OCI provider has been removed. My review focuses on improving the robustness of the new content type detection logic. I've suggested using path/filepath.Ext for more reliable file extension extraction, which is important for correctly determining the MIME type of S3 objects.
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind cleanup