Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Add ScalaC performance work to GSoC proposals #616

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add ScalaC performance work to GSoC proposals #616

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rorygraves
Copy link

No description provided.

@SethTisue SethTisue requested a review from adriaanm March 13, 2017 18:14
@rorygraves
Copy link
Author

@julienrf Can you review/merge this please?

@fommil
Copy link
Contributor

fommil commented Mar 23, 2017

@julienrf ping

@jvican
Copy link
Member

jvican commented Mar 23, 2017

Hey @rorygraves, thanks for proposing this!

I'm not in charge of GSoC but I'd like to share my mind with you. In my opinion, I don't think this is a good GSoC project. These are the reasons:

  1. The proposed topic is too complex. The likelihood of finding a student that has the skills to carry out benchmarking and performance work is close to zero. It requires expertise of Scala, JVM and compiler internals.
  2. The time to carry it out is only three months. Even if you find a good student, she won't be able to learn everything in that limited period.
  3. The description is a little bit vague and unclear.
  4. The likelihood of doing progress on this area is very low, and even more if it's noticeable.

Because of this, I would prefer to have other GSoC projects that are more achievable. I think there are lots of interesting projects that would deserve a slot before this one because they are more likely to get finished and be a success.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Mar 23, 2017

Well put, Jorge. I concur. (And, thanks for writing the reasons up before any of us at Lightbend got to it.)

I don't want to give the impression that the Scala team doesn't welcome participation in this kind of work, though... it's just not a good fit for GSoC in particular.

here's some links for Rory and anyone else interested in this area of work:

@rorygraves
Copy link
Author

Fair enough - things are rapidly changing in this area - when I was originally thinking of this item it was before the 2.13 roadmap and work was as public (esp @retronym s recent fixes.
I still think there is room for more tooling in this area that is a student sized project, but I agree on the complexity of finding individual changes. Happy to see the focus on performance that is happening (and happy to be involved)

@rorygraves rorygraves closed this Mar 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.