Issues
is:issue state:open
is:issue state:open
Search results
Review Draft 20 - 5. User Agent Requirements
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#518 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.1.4. Paths and Path-Match
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#517 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.1. Subcomponent Algorithms
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#516 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.2.1. Document-based requests
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#515 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.2. "Same-site" and "cross-site" Requests
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#514 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.1.3. Domain Matching
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#513 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.1.2. Canonicalized Host Names
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#512 In salesforce/tough-cookie;Review Draft 20 - 5.1.1. Dates
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#511 In salesforce/tough-cookie;- Status: Open.#496 In salesforce/tough-cookie;
- Status: Open.#479 In salesforce/tough-cookie;
- Status: Open.#410 In salesforce/tough-cookie;
Why sameSite=None is not added for toString method
6265bisOfficially proposed changes to RFC 6265Officially proposed changes to RFC 6265Status: Open.#378 In salesforce/tough-cookie;