[perf] test MCP510 #113382

lqd · Jul 5, 2023

lqd · Jul 5, 2023

Let's see if the bootstrapping cfgs are correctly set up.

lqd · Jul 5, 2023

Let's see if the bootstrapping cfgs are correctly set up.

$  cargo +4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c build -q && readelf -p .comment ./target/debug/helloworld

String dump of section '.comment':
  [     0]  GCC: (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04.1) 11.3.0
  [    2d]  Linker: LLD 16.0.5

Looks like yes?

rust-timer · Jul 5, 2023

Finished benchmarking commit (4cb98396e9dc17fbe9b0da2b1bd35d9b05fff30c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Warning ⚠: The following benchmark(s) failed to build:

rustc

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-34.1%	[-74.8%, -0.6%]	31
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-32.7%	[-74.0%, -3.7%]	74
All ❌✅ (primary)	-34.1%	[-74.8%, -0.6%]	31

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	27.8%	[21.9%, 33.7%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.3%	[2.3%, 2.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	27.8%	[21.9%, 33.7%]	2

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-32.3%	[-65.9%, -1.4%]	28
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-28.4%	[-64.8%, -3.3%]	73
All ❌✅ (primary)	-32.3%	[-65.9%, -1.4%]	28

Binary size

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.6%	[0.6%, 2.4%]	20
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 1.1%]	61
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.4%, -0.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.6%	[0.6%, 2.4%]	20

Bootstrap: missing data

lqd · Jul 18, 2023

The data gathering is done so I'll close this for now, but may reopen to rerun crater on these new try artifacts.

rust-timer · May 8, 2025

Finished benchmarking commit (4352de4): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.5%, 0.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.3%, -0.2%]	99
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-3.3%, -0.2%]	45
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-1.3%, 0.5%]	100

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 0.2%, secondary -1.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.8%	[0.4%, 3.8%]	21
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.1%	[1.2%, 5.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.2%	[-8.3%, -1.2%]	4
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.1%	[-3.9%, -2.2%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.2%	[-8.3%, 3.8%]	25

Cycles

Results (primary -0.6%, secondary -2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.4%, 0.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.1%, -0.4%]	26
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-2.7%, -2.5%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.6%	[-1.1%, 0.5%]	28

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	55
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	25
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.2%]	55

Bootstrap: 772.853s -> 768.449s (-0.57%)
Artifact size: 365.33 MiB -> 365.32 MiB (-0.00%)

lqd · May 13, 2025

@bors try @rust-timer queue

bors · May 13, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 186592e with merge c4a0099...

[perf] test MCP510 r? `@ghost`

bors · May 13, 2025

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c4a0099 (c4a00993f8ee02c7565e7be652608817ea2fb97d)

rust-timer · May 13, 2025

Finished benchmarking commit (c4a0099): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.1%]	14
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.6%	[-1.4%, -0.3%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.1%	[-0.3%, 1.1%]	15

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.9%, secondary -3.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.4%	[-2.7%, -2.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-3.0%, -3.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-2.7%, 1.5%]	5

Cycles

Results (primary -1.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.2%	[-1.2%, -1.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.2%	[-1.2%, -1.2%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 771.795s -> 773.166s (0.18%)
Artifact size: 365.42 MiB -> 365.30 MiB (-0.03%)

lqd · May 27, 2025

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[perf] test MCP510 r? `@ghost`

bors · May 27, 2025

⌛ Trying commit 85bffc6 with merge 55ea8a0...

rust-log-analyzer · May 27, 2025

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

#2 transferring dockerfile: 2.62kB done
#2 DONE 0.0s

#3 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04
#3 ERROR: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
------
 > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04:
------
Dockerfile:1
--------------------
   1 | >>> FROM ubuntu:22.04
   2 |     
   3 |     ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: ubuntu:22.04: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
Command failed. Attempt 2/5:
#0 building with "sad_antonelli" instance using docker-container driver

#1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#1 transferring dockerfile: 2.62kB done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04
#2 ERROR: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
------
 > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04:
------
Dockerfile:1
--------------------
   1 | >>> FROM ubuntu:22.04
   2 |     
   3 |     ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: ubuntu:22.04: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
Command failed. Attempt 3/5:
#0 building with "sad_antonelli" instance using docker-container driver

#1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#1 transferring dockerfile: 2.62kB done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04
#2 ERROR: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
------
 > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04:
------
Dockerfile:1
--------------------
   1 | >>> FROM ubuntu:22.04
   2 |     
   3 |     ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: ubuntu:22.04: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
Command failed. Attempt 4/5:
#0 building with "sad_antonelli" instance using docker-container driver

#1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#1 transferring dockerfile: 2.62kB done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04
#2 ERROR: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
------
 > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04:
------
Dockerfile:1
--------------------
   1 | >>> FROM ubuntu:22.04
   2 |     
   3 |     ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: ubuntu:22.04: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
Command failed. Attempt 5/5:
#0 building with "sad_antonelli" instance using docker-container driver

#1 [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile
#1 transferring dockerfile: 2.62kB done
#1 DONE 0.0s

#2 [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04
#2 ERROR: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
------
 > [internal] load metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04:
------
Dockerfile:1
--------------------
   1 | >>> FROM ubuntu:22.04
   2 |     
   3 |     ARG DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
--------------------
ERROR: failed to solve: ubuntu:22.04: failed to resolve source metadata for docker.io/library/ubuntu:22.04: failed to copy: httpReadSeeker: failed open: unexpected status code https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/ubuntu/manifests/sha256:67cadaff1dca187079fce41360d5a7eb6f7dcd3745e53c79ad5efd8563118240: 429 Too Many Requests - Server message: toomanyrequests: You have reached your unauthenticated pull rate limit. https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit
The command has failed after 5 attempts.
##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
Post job cleanup.

lqd · May 27, 2025

@rust-timer build 55ea8a0

rust-timer · May 27, 2025

Finished benchmarking commit (55ea8a0): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.4%	[1.4%, 1.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-10.5%, -0.1%]	69
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-1.2%, -0.2%]	57
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.9%	[-10.5%, 1.4%]	70

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.8%, secondary 0.8%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.8%	[1.6%, 2.0%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.9%	[1.0%, 3.4%]	9
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-4.0%	[-5.5%, -2.6%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.8%	[1.6%, 2.0%]	3

Cycles

Results (primary -3.6%, secondary -3.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.6%	[-11.3%, -0.8%]	11
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-4.3%, -2.2%]	14
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.6%	[-11.3%, -0.8%]	11

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 779.351s -> 778.743s (-0.08%)
Artifact size: 366.34 MiB -> 366.39 MiB (0.01%)

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 5, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 5, 2023

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Sign in to view

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 5, 2023

lqd closed this Jul 18, 2023

lqd reopened this Sep 12, 2023

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from 793c8e6 to a9e047f Compare September 12, 2023 15:38

rustbot added the T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) label Sep 12, 2023

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from a9e047f to 68e4f7d Compare September 12, 2023 17:25

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from 68e4f7d to fb7cde3 Compare September 20, 2023 17:39

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from fb7cde3 to 3adfc22 Compare September 20, 2023 17:47

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from 3adfc22 to df25e9c Compare September 20, 2023 18:04

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from df25e9c to 03e476e Compare September 20, 2023 19:19

lqd closed this Sep 20, 2023

lqd reopened this Sep 21, 2023

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from 03e476e to 5e67656 Compare September 21, 2023 18:31

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. perf-regression Performance regression. labels May 8, 2025

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from d8a4405 to 186592e Compare May 13, 2025 14:43

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 13, 2025

Auto merge of rust-lang#113382 - lqd:test-mcp510, r=<try>

c4a0099

[perf] test MCP510 r? `@ghost`

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 13, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels May 13, 2025

wip

85bffc6

lqd force-pushed the test-mcp510 branch from 186592e to 85bffc6 Compare May 27, 2025 07:55

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label May 27, 2025

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025

Auto merge of #113382 - lqd:test-mcp510, r=<try>

55ea8a0

[perf] test MCP510 r? `@ghost`

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

switch dataflow test to a different analysis

f7fe204

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. perf-regression Performance regression. labels May 27, 2025

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

[perf] test MCP510 #113382

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[perf] test MCP510 #113382

Conversation

lqd commented Jul 5, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

lqd commented Jul 5, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as duplicate.

This comment has been minimized.

lqd commented Jul 5, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Jul 5, 2023

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

lqd commented Jul 18, 2023

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment was marked as outdated.

This comment was marked as resolved.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented May 8, 2025

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

lqd commented May 13, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented May 13, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented May 13, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented May 13, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

lqd commented May 27, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

bors commented May 27, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

rust-log-analyzer commented May 27, 2025

Uh oh!

lqd commented May 27, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented May 27, 2025

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

lqd commented Jul 5, 2023 •

edited

Loading

lqd commented Jul 5, 2023 •

edited

Loading