Rust survey results (draft) #56
Conversation
A few changes still pending.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking really good so far 😄 Looks like we got some really useful feedback.
A few comments on the formatting:
The graphs look nice, but it'd be good if we could take a cue from the main Rust surveys and provide a little summary of the data alongside them? That way, if someone isn't able to view the image for whatever reason (e.g. screen readers) they'll not lose out.
Also, I really like the idea of displaying the 'signal strength' of each individual item, but I think it might be better to just show that as a number rather than a bar, so it's easier to compare.
|
This is really good data. Thanks for all the work you have done. So happy that map has debug visualization and cargo profiles will also solve the debug config pains :) |
|
Alright, this is ready for final review now. I've incorporated your feedback @17cupsofcoffee , thanks! Can be published at-will. |
content/posts/survey-01/index.md
Outdated
| [graphic pending] | ||
| Just for fun, we asked respondents to name libraries or projects they were thankful for. In the 6 months that have passed since this survey went out there's been quite a few newcomers on the rise that would probably show more prominently here if we asked again today. Rest assured there will be more surveys. | ||
|  | ||
| _Thanks so much to the survey respondents and all the people out there working tirelessly make Rust a first-tier language and ecosystem for game development._ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| _Thanks so much to the survey respondents and all the people out there working tirelessly make Rust a first-tier language and ecosystem for game development._ | |
| _Thank you so much to the survey respondents and all the people out there working tirelessly to make Rust a first-tier language and ecosystem for game development._ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Has this been applied? I haven't used this GH feature before so I'm not quite sure what happened when I committed your first set of suggestions. These other suggestions are apparently "outdated" now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The second suggestion seems not to have been applied.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, I guess I should’ve opted for “add suggestion to batch” instead. Could you please resubmit the missing suggestions?
Co-Authored-By: Wodann <Wodann@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
||
| ### IDE/RLS story (28) | ||
|
|
||
| Tooling around IDE is limited compared to Visual Studio with C++ or C#.´ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a bullet point missing here and on lines 112/114.
I also kinda wonder if there's a way to format these bullets to make it a little clearer that they're quotes, but it's probably fine as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think marking it as quotes is actually a good point. The first time I read it, I wasn't sure whether they were a distilled, bullet-point summary of reflective quotes.
We can just use:
Quote goes here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the site's current styling, quotes would look like this:
If you do decide to go that route, please let me know if you're not happy with the fonts/italics/etc - I can submit a quick PR to change them before this post gets merged :)
|
Changed all to quotes, except for the last lists which were chiefly distillations rather than handpicked quotes. If that's deemed confusing that can still be changed. I'll merge this now so we can start spreading the word shortly. Formatting changes after publishing won't be a problem; the data won't change after all. |
|
Looks good :) Thank you for all your hard work on this! |
A few changes still pending, in particular the wordcloud graphic for "libraries you're thankful for"
I'll share access to the form on Google Docs with the other WG leads.