Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Payload reclaim code assumes synchronous onNext() dispatch which is not guaranteed by RS specification #196

Copy link
Copy link
@2m

Description

@2m
Issue body actions

I have been playing around with the latest code from the 0.5.x branch. I started with the following code from the examples subproject:

Flowable.fromPublisher(c.underlyingSocket.requestResponse(new PayloadImpl("Hello")))
  .doOnNext(toConsumer(x => println(s"### client ### ${ByteBufferUtil.toUtf8String(x.getData)}")))
  .blockingFirst()

which prints out the response as expected. However when trying to connect the Publisher that is returned from the requestResponse to Akka Streams with the following code:

Source.fromPublisher(c.underlyingSocket.requestResponse(new PayloadImpl("Hello")))
  .map { x => println(s"### client ### ${ByteBufferUtil.toUtf8String(x.getData)}"); x }
  .runWith(Sink.head)

I get an exception:

io.netty.util.IllegalReferenceCountException: refCnt: 0
        at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.ensureAccessible(AbstractByteBuf.java:1407)
        at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.checkIndex(AbstractByteBuf.java:1353)
        at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.getInt(AbstractByteBuf.java:415)
        at io.netty.buffer.PooledSlicedByteBuf.getInt(PooledSlicedByteBuf.java:188)
        at io.reactivesocket.transport.tcp.MutableDirectByteBuf.getInt(MutableDirectByteBuf.java:284)
        at io.reactivesocket.frame.FrameHeaderFlyweight.frameLength(FrameHeaderFlyweight.java:229)
        at io.reactivesocket.frame.FrameHeaderFlyweight.dataLength(FrameHeaderFlyweight.java:251)
        at io.reactivesocket.frame.FrameHeaderFlyweight.sliceFrameData(FrameHeaderFlyweight.java:202)
        at io.reactivesocket.Frame.getData(Frame.java:98)
        at akka.stream.alpakka.reactivesocket.scaladsl.HelloWorld$$anonfun$start$1$$anonfun$2.apply(HelloWorld.scala:113)
        at akka.stream.alpakka.reactivesocket.scaladsl.HelloWorld$$anonfun$start$1$$anonfun$2.apply(HelloWorld.scala:113)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.Map$$anon$8.onPush(Ops.scala:43)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.GraphInterpreter.processPush(GraphInterpreter.scala:747)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.GraphInterpreter.processEvent(GraphInterpreter.scala:710)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.GraphInterpreter.execute(GraphInterpreter.scala:616)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.GraphInterpreterShell.runBatch(ActorGraphInterpreter.scala:471)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.GraphInterpreterShell.receive(ActorGraphInterpreter.scala:410)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.ActorGraphInterpreter.akka$stream$impl$fusing$ActorGraphInterpreter$$processEvent(ActorGraphInterpreter.scala:603)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.ActorGraphInterpreter$$anonfun$receive$1.applyOrElse(ActorGraphInterpreter.scala:618)
        at akka.actor.Actor$class.aroundReceive(Actor.scala:484)
        at akka.stream.impl.fusing.ActorGraphInterpreter.aroundReceive(ActorGraphInterpreter.scala:529)
        at akka.actor.ActorCell.receiveMessage(ActorCell.scala:526)
        at akka.actor.ActorCell.invoke(ActorCell.scala:495)
        at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.processMailbox(Mailbox.scala:257)
        at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.run(Mailbox.scala:224)
        at akka.dispatch.Mailbox.exec(Mailbox.scala:234)
        at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
        at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339)
        at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
        at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)

I there a race condition between something a Publisher from reactivesocket expects and my call to getData?

P.S. currently I am publishing locally latest code of the 0.5.x branch. Would it be possible to get a milestone release, so it is easier to share and run these experiments?

Reactions are currently unavailable

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.