Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[nativert] Port string join and split to c10/util #152873

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yiming0416
Copy link
Contributor

@yiming0416 yiming0416 commented May 5, 2025

Summary:
Torch Native Runtime RFC: pytorch/rfcs#72
Port string utils functions join and split to c10/util

Test Plan:
Added tests in string_util_test.cpp
buck2 run mode/opt caffe2/c10/test:util_base_tests

Differential Revision: D74202473

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 5, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/152873

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 59cdec9 with merge base 7a0781e (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74202473


C10_API std::string join(
std::string_view delimiter,
const std::vector<std::string>& keys);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it better to use std::vector<std::string_view>?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cyyever well maybe... but for usability, we have existing internal usage of this function with std::vector<std::string> as the argument type, it might be a bit clunky to convert the input types. So I'd prefer to keep the current signature if this is not a blocking comment.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label May 6, 2025
@cyyever
Copy link
Collaborator

cyyever commented May 6, 2025

@yiming0416 If there are more string functions coming, we should consider ranges.

return atoms;
}

std::string join(
Copy link
Collaborator

@Skylion007 Skylion007 May 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

C10::str already implements a join method. Also for other code, just use fmt::join. It is more performant FYI and doesn't require any C10 dependency.

@albanD albanD removed their request for review May 6, 2025 13:44
yiming0416 added a commit to yiming0416/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Summary:

Port string utils functions join and split to c10/util

Test Plan:
Added tests in `string_util_test.cpp`
buck2 run mode/opt caffe2/c10/test:util_base_tests

Differential Revision: D74202473
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#152873

Port string utils functions join and split to c10/util

Test Plan:
Added tests in `string_util_test.cpp`
buck2 run mode/opt caffe2/c10/test:util_base_tests

Differential Revision: D74202473
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D74202473

@yiming0416
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removed the newly added join() as it can be replaced by fmt::join()

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / cuda12.4-py3.10-gcc9-sm80 / build

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

huydhn commented May 7, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.