-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.4k
ci: Remove manylinux 2014 remnants #148028
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/148028
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 2 New Failures, 3 Cancelled Jobs, 1 PendingAs of commit 481a862 with merge base 723f3a9 ( NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:
CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014, we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in .ci/docker/manywheel/ Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com> ghstack-source-id: aff93fd Pull Request resolved: #148028
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 6 jobs have failed, first few of them are: Build Triton wheels / Build Triton Wheel (3.9, cuda, pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu), Build Triton wheels / Build Triton Wheel (3.10, cuda, pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu), Build Triton wheels / Build Triton Wheel (3.11, cuda, pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu), Build Triton wheels / Build Triton Wheel (3.12, cuda, pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu), Build Triton wheels / Build Triton Wheel (3.13, cuda, pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu) Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ jobs: | ||
DOCKER_IMAGE: ${{ matrix.device == 'rocm' && format('pytorch/manylinux2_28-builder:rocm{0}', matrix.rocm_version) || matrix.docker-image }} | ||
PY_VERS: ${{ matrix.py_vers }} | ||
BUILD_DEVICE: ${{ matrix.device }} | ||
PLATFORM: ${{ contains(matrix.docker-image, '2_28') && 'manylinux_2_28_x86_64' || 'manylinux2014_x86_64' }} | ||
PLATFORM: ${{ contains(matrix.docker-image, '2_28') && 'manylinux_2_28_x86_64' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This turns PLATFORM
into a boolean false
when the docker image doesn't contain 2_28
and fails the build, i.e. https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/13556101092/job/37890623418
PLATFORM: ${{ contains(matrix.docker-image, '2_28') && 'manylinux_2_28_x86_64' }} | |
PLATFORM: 'manylinux_2_28_x86_64' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think pytorch/manylinux-builder:cpu
on line 49 would also need to be removed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. Thank you.
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014, we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in .ci/docker/manywheel/ Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com> ghstack-source-id: 159a5e5 Pull Request resolved: #148028 Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com>
@atalman Can I ignore the Triton wheel build failures? It looks like the wheel failures are for the old version of manylinux that we don't support anymore |
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014, we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in .ci/docker/manywheel/ Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com> ghstack-source-id: 0950613 Pull Request resolved: #148028 Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com>
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014, we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in .ci/docker/manywheel/ Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com> ghstack-source-id: a8b0333 Pull Request resolved: #148028 Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com>
@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014, we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in .ci/docker/manywheel/ > [!TIP] > I checked if we were using these by running > `rg 2014 .github/` Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas <eliuriegas@meta.com> Pull Request resolved: pytorch#148028 Approved by: https://github.com/wdvr, https://github.com/malfet, https://github.com/atalman
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
These are the only remaining references I could find to manylinux2014,
we should probably look to remove these a bit quicker since it made it
difficult to know which Dockerfiles were important in
.ci/docker/manywheel/
Tip
I checked if we were using these by running
rg 2014 .github/
Signed-off-by: Eli Uriegas eliuriegas@meta.com