Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings

remove constraints from aot_compile #120979

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

remove constraints from aot_compile #120979

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

avikchaudhuri
Copy link
Contributor

Differential Revision: D54405986

@pytorch-bot PyTorch Bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/120979

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 2195c03 with merge base ea7149a (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D54405986

@avikchaudhuri @facebook-github-bot
remove constraints from aot_compile
2195c03 
Test Plan: none

Differential Revision: D54405986
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D54405986

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Mar 1, 2024
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -f 'Landed internally'

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, using force because this PR might not pass merge_rules.json but landed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zhxchen17 zhxchen17 zhxchen17 approved these changes

@gmagogsfm gmagogsfm Awaiting requested review from gmagogsfm

@tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan Awaiting requested review from tugsbayasgalan tugsbayasgalan is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@avikchaudhuri @facebook-github-bot @pytorchmergebot @zhxchen17
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.