Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

PySequence_Fast needs new macros to be safe in a nogil world #119247

Copy link
Copy link
Closed
@MojoVampire

Description

@MojoVampire
Issue body actions

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

Right now, most uses of PySequence_Fast are invalid in a nogil context when it is passed an existing list; PySequence_FAST_ITEMS returns a reference to the internal array of PyObject*s that can be resized at any time if other threads add or delete items, PySequence_FAST_GET_SIZE similarly reports a size that is invalid an instant after it's reported. Similarly, if individual items are replaced without changing size, you'd have similar issues.

But when the argument passed is a tuple (incref-ed and returned unchanged, but safe due to immutability) or any non-list type (converted to new list) no lock is needed. Per conversation with Dino, going to create macros, to be called after a call to PySequence_Fast, to conditionally lock and unlock the original list when applicable, while avoiding locks in all other cases, before any other PySequence* APIs are used.

Preliminary (subject to bike-shedding) macro names are:

Py_BEGIN_CRITICAL_SECTION_SEQUENCE_FAST
Py_END_CRITICAL_SECTION_SEQUENCE_FAST

both defined in pycore_critical_section.h.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

Discussion occurred with Dino during CPython core sprints.

Linked PRs

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions

    Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.