We've discovered that if you manually type out a condition that evaluates to False in the new REPL, False is printed as the result, as expected...

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
False

...but that if you copy and paste this condition into the REPL, nothing is printed (implying that the condition evaluates to None:

>>> (3, 13, 0, "final") < (3, 13, 0, "beta")
>>> 

Thanks @Eclips4 for realising that the difference in behaviour here was due to copying-and-pasting the condition rather than typing it out!

Originally posted by @AlexWaygood in #111201 (comment)

Linked PRs

• gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately #119318
• [3.13] gh-118893: Evaluate all statements in the new REPL separately (GH-119318) #119408