Closed
Description
With code such as:
import enum
class Flag(enum.Flag):
A = 0x01
B = 0x02
Mask = 0xff
print(~Flag.A)Python 3.10.11 prints Flag.B, and so does Python 3.11.3. However, with Python 3.11.4, this happens instead:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/florian/tmp/f.py", line 9, in <module>
print(~Flag.A)
^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1542, in __invert__
self._inverted_ = self.__class__(self._flag_mask_ ^ self._value_)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 711, in __call__
return cls.__new__(cls, value)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1136, in __new__
raise exc
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1113, in __new__
result = cls._missing_(value)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1454, in _missing_
raise ValueError('%r: no members with value %r' % (cls, unknown))
ValueError: <flag 'Flag'>: no members with value 252As a workaround, a detour via .value works in this case:
>>> Flag((Flag.A | Flag.B).value & ~Flag.A.value)
<Flag.B: 2>This causes issues with PyQt, which has the following flags (as bindings from C++):
>>> from PyQt6.QtCore import Qt
>>> for e in Qt.KeyboardModifier:
... print(f"{e.name} = {hex(e.value)}")
...
NoModifier = 0x0
ShiftModifier = 0x2000000
ControlModifier = 0x4000000
AltModifier = 0x8000000
MetaModifier = 0x10000000
KeypadModifier = 0x20000000
GroupSwitchModifier = 0x40000000
KeyboardModifierMask = 0xfe000000(Output from Python 3.10 - with Python 3.11, KeyboardModifierMask goes missing in the output, and so does Flag.Mask above, but that seems like a different issue?)
With my project, I'm trying to remove a modifier from the given flags. With Python 3.10.11 and 3.11.3:
>>> (Qt.KeyboardModifier.ShiftModifier | Qt.KeyboardModifier.ControlModifier) & ~Qt.KeyboardModifier.ControlModifier
<KeyboardModifier.ShiftModifier: 33554432>But with Python 3.11.4, same issue as above:
>>> from PyQt6.QtCore import Qt
>>> (Qt.KeyboardModifier.ShiftModifier | Qt.KeyboardModifier.ControlModifier) & ~Qt.KeyboardModifier.ControlModifier
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1542, in __invert__
self._inverted_ = self.__class__(self._flag_mask_ ^ self._value_)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 711, in __call__
return cls.__new__(cls, value)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1136, in __new__
raise exc
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1113, in __new__
result = cls._missing_(value)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/lib/python3.11/enum.py", line 1454, in _missing_
raise ValueError('%r: no members with value %r' % (cls, unknown))
ValueError: <flag 'KeyboardModifier'>: no members with value 2147483648As a culprit, I suspect:
- enum.CONFORM behavior breaks backwards compatibility #103365
- gh-103365: [Enum] STRICT boundary corrections #103494
- [3.11] gh-103365: [Enum] STRICT boundary corrections (GH-103494) #103513
Linked PRs
- gh-105497: [Enum] Fix flag inversion when alias/mask members exist. #105542
- [3.11] gh-105497: [Enum] Fix Flag inversion when alias/mask members exist. (GH-105542) #105571
- [3.12] gh-105497: [Enum] Fix Flag inversion when alias/mask members exist. (GH-105542) #105572
- gh-105497: [Enum] Fix flag mask inversion when unnamed flags exist #106468
- [3.12] gh-105497: [Enum] Fix flag mask inversion when unnamed flags exist (GH-106468) #106620
- [3.11] gh-105497: [Enum] Fix flag mask inversion when unnamed flags exist (GH-106468) #106621
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
only security fixesonly security fixesonly security fixesonly security fixesPython modules in the Lib dirPython modules in the Lib dirAn unexpected behavior, bug, or errorAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
Projects
Status
Done