Use type flag instead of custom constructor in _struct.unpack_iterator

Currently _struct.unpack_iterator type defines its own constructor just to report to user that it isn't instantiable (with a typo, by the way):

cpython/Modules/_struct.c

Lines 1835 to 1838 in 8d95012

    
           PyObject *unpackiter_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds) { 
        
               PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError, "Cannot create '%.200s objects", _PyType_Name(type)); 
        
               return NULL; 
        
           }

It can be easily removed and replaced by appropriate type flag. I'll submit a PR.

Linked PRs

gh-104276: Make _struct.unpack_iterator type use type flag instead of custom constructor #104277

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Use type flag instead of custom constructor in `_struct.unpack_iterator` #104276

Linked PRs

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

	PyObject unpackiter_new(PyTypeObject type, PyObject args, PyObject kwds) {
	PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError, "Cannot create '%.200s objects", _PyType_Name(type));
	return NULL;
	}

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Uh oh!

Use type flag instead of custom constructor in _struct.unpack_iterator #104276

Description

Linked PRs

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Use type flag instead of custom constructor in `_struct.unpack_iterator` #104276