Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Energy Production Modeling and Provenance #96

Copy link
Copy link
Open
@bt-

Description

@bt-
Issue body actions

I think this belongs as its own issue for discussion, but it is closely related to the conversation around #88 and #17.

I am new to PVLIB, contributing to projects on Github, and the scientific python stack, but I do have experience working with other PV energy production modeling software (Helioscope, PVsyst, and SAM).

One issue that I've encountered when working with these programs is keeping track of revisions to the model, especially when working with a team. It seems like this issue could be largely resolved by using PVLIB and keeping the file defining the system under version control with git or maybe a more comprehensive provenance system like Sumatra.

It seems like a good time to express the desire to use PVLIB in this manner because the approach to defining an entire system from module through inverter and step-up XFMR to interconnection like in #88 is still in development.

I agree with @jforbess point in #88 that CSV input will be useful, but I would like to see a json or yaml convention develop that could be used for version controlled system configuration input files.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.