Recently, I tried an open-source project on GitHub called LinkMind, which supports multiple models like Claude, GPT, and Gemini. They gave a 30-yuan trial credit, and I found it pretty easy to use. If you’re interested, you can look it up.

what price is that? can work with visual studio code? caloude haiku 4.5?

The first non api call based pay structure version to come out is gonna dominate 100% of the market share. I'm putting my money on China and Mother Russia

They're priced at the same as Opus 4.7 though, so there's no point.

They're priced at the same as Opus 4.7 though, so there's no point.

So, can the Pro version still use 4.6?

They're priced at the same as Opus 4.7 though, so there's no point.

People online say that Opus 4.7 uses more tokens per request on average than 4.6, so it's not quite obvious what is better.

They're priced at the same as Opus 4.7 though, so there's no point.

So, can the Pro version still use 4.6?

Nyooooope.

From the article that we are all discussing:

1. Opus models are no longer available in Pro plans. Opus 4.7 remains available in Pro+ plans. As we announced in our changelog, Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6 will be removed from Pro+.

Huh, that's weird. I feel like I would have noticed that. Okay, let me click it.

Ah, okay. If you have Changelog emails turned on, or follow their Blog, you may have noticed a changelog entry titled Claude 4.7 is Generally Available" and, like me assumed "okay, they released 4.7 for Copilot, I'll check the multipliers later."

Wait, but they said they informed us that Pro users would lose access? I don't see anything like that after skimming through the changelog. Well, if you actually read the entire link at a snail's speed, you can sort of cobble together what Microsoft PR tried to do 11 days ago.

It seems like they are not going to be providing any Opus models (the biggest visible announcement in that changelog was that Opus 4.7 would be provided at a promotional multiplier at 7.5x for a few weeks, making several users assume that it was a typo -- surely it's not correct that the regular multiplier rate will be 22.5x?) Well, it's worse, it's actually 27x.

To go back to @M4XEURS question, a few days after they posted the announcement about Opus 4.7, all Opus models were silently removed from Copilot. We're on version 1.0.39 and I remember 1.0.36 already didn't have them.

So where was this notice they talk about? Well, I've read the changelog three times to make sure I didn't miss anything. It appears that what they mean by "we announced in our changelog" is two sentences, one of which is buried in the second paragraph and the second appearing after a subtitle and a video. If you read them together, you might divine the meaning.

It's a sneaky attempt, but Microsoft still has a lot to learn from BP and Shell. I can see their thinking though, this is exactly where someone looking for answers as to why Opus suddenly disappeared from their paid Copilot version would look first, in their "Opus 4.7 is now available!" email.

@M4XEURS these are the sentences they expected (edit: they obviously didn't and just buried the announcement) you to add together and after a few minutes' of mental arithmetic come up with the conclusion that all Opus models have been removed from Copilot Pro.

As part of our efforts to improve service reliability, we are streamlining our model offerings. Over the coming weeks, Opus 4.7 will replace Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6 in the model picker for Copilot Pro+. We’ve seen strong improvements across our benchmarks, and we’re committed to providing individual users with state-of-the-art models while ensuring a fast, reliable Copilot experience

If you scroll past all the crap following the paragraph, you might notice:

Claude Opus 4.7 will be available to Copilot Pro+, Business, and Enterprise users.

And if you combine the two sentences together in your mind, then drop the "assume good faith" thing Wikipedia has been teaching us, you might come to the conclusion that Opus models are going away from Copilot Pro plans. Ah, yes. Clear as mud.

I don't know about all you dullards, but I know that if my software is losing a major feature, there is nowhere better to announce it than by sandwiching it into a a "changelog" about a NEW feature. Can't wait for the email from my toaster manufacturer with the subject "Congrats! Your toaster now consumes 45% less electricity!"

Your toaster now tells you the weather for the upcoming day when the handle is pressed and consumes 45% less electricity! This firmware upgrade will be pushed through automatically when toaster is next connected to WiFi. As part of the upgrade, the bagel/poptart/bread toasting functions will be consolidated into NeoToast, which will be available to anyone on a ToasterPro+ plan or above.

This was your notice:

I have never seen a company be so blatantly disingenous with their customers. Forget evil, this is less malice and more incompetence. It's like the VP of Communications found a copy of Catch-22 on the table at Starbucks and read it as an instruction manual. "Oh, you have an annual subscription? We're not raising prices, we're simply telling you that you now have 33 Sonnet 4.6 premium credits instead of 300! We didn't remove your access to 4.6, we simply "consolidated" it into Opus 4.7 (note; you will not have access to the "streamlined" Opus models, even if you previously did. Where did we announce that? Well, in the changelog that implied you'd get access to Opus 4.7, obviously.)

You know, I understand companies can be evil, or rather that I should not expect them to act in by best interests. I even understand that at $8.33/mo on an annual Pro plan, you will need to change something so you're not losing money now that LLMs are expected to be agentic, call tools, have a larger context windows and take longer autonomous actions on one request.

I got my annual subscription in August of last year. By December, I realised they would not be offering a $10/mo subscription if one premium credit could mean anything from "List the first five prime numbers" to "Why Darmok and Jalad at Kalenda's? Why not Darmok and Kalenda at Jalad's?" to "Create an MVP of Amazon for dogs, including all the specs of a physical product like an Amazon Dot, so that any time the doggo wants treats, they can just boop the "treat button" that instantly dropships dog streats. Finally, when MVP is done, send an email to the top VCs in my area. Make no mistakes."

I have three months in my annnual plan. I just figured that they'd let me ride out the rest of my few months -- what would it cost to them to have three months at the old cost, and simply give the new cost to new/monthly customers? Obviously for the tail end of the distribution quite a lot, but consider the PR and reputation loss from this cluster.. vs. the number of companies who would actually trust Microsoft more if they honoured their commitments. They could still switch most people, who are on monthly plans!

(btw, @microsoft, we actually have something in common: I also am really bad and marketing and not knowing what my users want. Can I get hired? From what I've seen over the last 48 hr I wil fit into your company culture perfectly and I'm pretty sure you can just give me production access on the first day. Don't worry, I know the Status/Outages page must stay super-hidden, I got you.)

Anyway, for anyone on a Pro plan this is your notice that your Opus models went away a few weeks ago. Sorry, I meant were consolidated into a model you don't have access to.

You know, if you any of you fall on hard times you practice that in the mirror next time you consider robbing a house:

I swear officer, I was just consolidating their newest belongings into the back of my truck!

I don't really have anything further to say. If you've read this far, congrats, I guess? And may god have mercy on my soul for making you do so.

Github to Pro users: Sorry sir/madam, this is only for paying customers!

Hi @Shah-Nisarg, yes a refurn is available for Google Play subscribers, but I believe it needs to be processed via GitHub Support and is not self-serve. We're looking into this and will comment here again with specific guidance

How can an annual user convert to a monthly subscription? I haven't seen a clear way yet. If you want to cancel and renew your monthly subscription before May 20th, but it seems that once you cancel, you won't be able to subscribe anymore, or should you wait for a channel to convert after June 1st

How can an annual user convert to a monthly subscription? I haven't seen a clear way yet. If you want to cancel and renew your monthly subscription before May 20th, but it seems that once you cancel, you won't be able to subscribe anymore, or should you wait for a channel to convert after June 1st

I had a dig around for this too it's in Billing & Licensing -> Licensing and then on the right you'll have your subscription and a 'Manage subscription' drop down. If you click on that you can switch to monthly billing or request a refund. Probably wait until June to do any changes or I guess you won't get any pro-rata credits.

Literally why they're increasing the annual plan's premium usage request. In hope that they can screw people over hard enough that they cancel the annual plan so they stop loosing money on the old billing model.

Disgusting practices

I can't get in touch with anyone from support, they haven't answered tickets for over a month!

REQUEST IMMEDIATE REFUND OF UNAUTHORIZED CHARGES AND DEACTIVATION OF COPILOT PRO (NON-EXISTENT ON THE PORTAL)

Ticket:

#4392671
#4392659
#4295068

Yeah it's tough to see what the $10 gets you as the credits don't rollover vs. PAYG with Claude etc. Maybe it's basically just convenience with different model access?

Yeah it's tough to see what the $10 gets you as the credits don't rollover vs. PAYG with Claude etc. Maybe it's basically just convenience with different model access?

yeah as far as i can tell reading into all the posts.. all you get for pre-paying $39 is the privilege of talking to opus or GPT 5.5.. No real value adder.. I agree that the existing requests system was broken.. but I think this is essentially losing 90% of the value. For me the ability to choose different models was cute.. but not helpful.. often just increasing confusion.

For those dont understand what's happenning, Github is charging you 39$ to start using high tier models and 10$ to start using rest. If you surpass that $ amount you pay the extra, if you didn't its all gone....simple !

Seems like Opus model will be only for Pro+ plan https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/changes-to-github-copilot-individual-plans/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=github&utm_campaign=FY26APR-WW-LCM-BLA-ProPP-IND-Dev-TX-USGCHGMTH
Opus models are no longer available in Pro plans. Opus 4.7 remains available in Pro+ plans. As we announced in our changelog, Opus 4.5 and Opus 4.6 will be removed from Pro+.

I think that is stale, given on the new pricing you're paying for usage anyway, there doesn't seem to be a reason to hide high end models behind a higher tier which you're getting equivalent credits for anyway.

I fully agree, seeing the move they did by replacing opus 4.5 and 4.6 with 4.7 only and at 7.5x, I'm not surprised

Guess I should have said 15x ...

Higher credit at the start of every billing cycle? Lower multiplier for each request, perhaps? I have no idea, either. It could also be that paying for extra usage is charged at a higher rate than the monthly billing rate.
That's all speculation, of course, so I hope GitHub clarifies this for us.
Reading some of the screaming in other threads about other changes GitHub is making, I wonder if this is going to cause more harm than good.

$10 for $10 worth of usage at API rates is simply unusable unless/until API rates come down. There's zero reason to use GHCP after June 1st if this structure goes through as planned.

@OotTheMonk Everything is going to go this way at some point. Subscriptions are heavily subsidized at the moment, which is a major reason why neither OpenAI nor Anthropic are profitable. It works while they're growing and investors are throwing money at them, but it isn't sustainable. The API pricing is closer to what it actually costs them to provide the service, but as far as I know even the API prices aren't profitable at the moment.

I think Github Copilot moving towards being more like a PAYG plan is probably the beginning of an industry-wide movement over the next year or two.

I expect that there will be granularity down to the penny for billing. So, let’s say Pro at $10/mo gets 1000 AI credits. You ask a question that uses $3 of API billing, so it charges down your AI credits by 300, so you’re left with 700.

For some context, a single session with something like Opus or GPT-5.5 while doing a plan and implement can easily run into the realm of $30-40. For context, I did a plan of a pretty substantial feature today using API billing and Opus and it cost about $35 for that single chat session. (This was in Claude Code, not Copilot.)

With the pricing change, unless you use a ton of autocomplete suggestion stuff in your editor and that’s your main surface for interacting with Copilot, or if you have no other option at your work but to use Copilot, you’re better off with almost any other plan. If you like GPT models, that means going to OpenAI directly, or if you like Claude models, Anthropic.

I’m sad this change is happening, but I am not surprised in the slightest. I can only imagine that agentic workflows have GitHub hemorrhaging money, and while Microsoft did invest a lot in OpenAI, they are still apparently dealing with API pricing for the models GitHub serves? I think the only way a company can be competitive and offer a substantial value to compete against “Just to pay for the API yourself” is to train and serve their own models. We’ve seen that happen with Cursor, and I expect we’ll see more. (I thought that was the intention of Raptor Mini, but who knows what happens with that now.)

Also, the fact that the “AI Credits” expire at the end of the month means you’re almost certainly better off just going to the API providers directly and just paying there. If you use less than $10 or $39 in inference with your AI Credits in a month, you’d bet better off just paying à la carte API prices.

Now is a good time to start experimenting with agentic harnesses that aren’t connected to a specific provider’s service. (Things like opencode, for example.) Luckily the open weight models are getting better and better with each release, and hopefully we’ll continue to see reasonably priced API access for those continue.

I installed Claude Code and Codex VS Code extensions. Much better experience consumer wise.

But if someone is already invested in the vscode/github copilot ecosystem, they could always use bring-your-own-model-key (BYOK) and have API pricing of the model provider directly. So even if it is a price increase, it is still quite flexible.

But if someone is already invested in the vscode/github copilot ecosystem, they could always use bring-your-own-model-key (BYOK) and have API pricing of the model provider directly. So even if it is a price increase, it is still quite flexible.

You have the flexibility of paying more in every single other scenario, congrats

@science64 I made github.com/PanAchy/copilot-arewecooked as a way to get a sense of what your cost will be starting June based on your historical usage.

Machine translation:

I have a Copilot Pro or Pro+ subscription and organizationally I have all the Microsoft Copilot 365 services, how does this apply to me.

@Omar5962, these changes aply to GitHub Copilot and not to Microsoft Copilot 365 services.

Machine translation:

estos cambios se aplican a GitHub Copilot y no a los servicios de Microsoft Copilot 365.

u forgot an p there in reality it is "apply"

Wow, what a bunch of greedy Fuc*ers

Good Ole Claude just recommended this for me lol.
My Honest Recommendation
Install Roo Code (free VS Code extension, search "Roo Code" or "Cline" in extensions)
Configure it to hit LM Studio at localhost:1234 — I'll write the config file for you! Free for 95% of sessions
For sessions that need Claude-level intelligence (hard bugs, architecture decisions): load OpenRouter credits, ~$20 tops for a month of heavy use Keep Continue for autocomplete while you type Total monthly cost: $0 to $20 depending on how much you lean on cloud models.

Roo Code (VS Code extension — already in your VS Code marketplace)
Closest match to what you do now. Full agent mode.

Reads files, writes files, runs terminal, chains tasks — identical to Copilot agent
Backend is your choice: LM Studio local (free), OpenRouter, Anthropic direct
Point it at http://localhost:1234/v1 + whatever model LM Studio has loaded → $0/month
If local model isn't smart enough for hard tasks: add OpenRouter credits ($20-40/month actual usage, pay-as-you-go, not subscription)
OpenRouter has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at ~$3/million tokens — a heavy session costs $0.50, not $50
This is your answer. It's Copilot agent but you control the backend.

Cursor ($20/month flat)
VS Code fork — separate app, not an extension
Drag your workspace folder in, imports your extensions
Has full agent mode, multi-file edits, "composer" for autonomous tasks
$20/month hard cap, no overages
Uses their own Claude/GPT-4o access in the subscription
Downside: different app, small migration friction, still $20/month forever

Windsurf ($15/month flat)
VS Code fork by Codeium, separate app
"Cascade" mode is their agent — legitimately good, autonomous multi-file
$15/month hard cap
Better than Cursor for pure autonomous coding tasks in my read
Same downside: separate app, still a subscription

Mark, we should trust your free gift aftyer you called us greedy fuc*ers? lol (jk)

Regarding Roo Code (which I haven't used yet): just watch out for a (short?) potential rough time while the previous teams hands over to a new community team (link).

Good Ole Claude just recommended this for me lol. My Honest Recommendation Install Roo Code (free VS Code extension, search "Roo Code" or "Cline" in extensions) Configure it to hit LM Studio at localhost:1234 — I'll write the config file for you! Free for 95% of sessions For sessions that need Claude-level intelligence (hard bugs, architecture decisions): load OpenRouter credits, ~$20 tops for a month of heavy use Keep Continue for autocomplete while you type Total monthly cost: $0 to $20 depending on how much you lean on cloud models.

Roo Code (VS Code extension — already in your VS Code marketplace) Closest match to what you do now. Full agent mode.

Reads files, writes files, runs terminal, chains tasks — identical to Copilot agent Backend is your choice: LM Studio local (free), OpenRouter, Anthropic direct Point it at http://localhost:1234/v1 + whatever model LM Studio has loaded → $0/month If local model isn't smart enough for hard tasks: add OpenRouter credits ($20-40/month actual usage, pay-as-you-go, not subscription) OpenRouter has Claude Sonnet 4.5 at ~$3/million tokens — a heavy session costs $0.50, not $50 This is your answer. It's Copilot agent but you control the backend.

Cursor ($20/month flat) VS Code fork — separate app, not an extension Drag your workspace folder in, imports your extensions Has full agent mode, multi-file edits, "composer" for autonomous tasks $20/month hard cap, no overages Uses their own Claude/GPT-4o access in the subscription Downside: different app, small migration friction, still $20/month forever

Windsurf ($15/month flat) VS Code fork by Codeium, separate app "Cascade" mode is their agent — legitimately good, autonomous multi-file $15/month hard cap Better than Cursor for pure autonomous coding tasks in my read Same downside: separate app, still a subscription

I'm using cline - its good - you just have to be very organised, and set rules up. but with the addition of deepseek v4-pro you can spend ~$4-5 developing out a complex feature with a claude like model, then 80c getting deep seek to implement - If you are very brave you can ask deepseek to do it all for $1.

I just implemented ~4000 lines this way, overall its okay; needs a bit of tidyup but it does work.

Opus 4.6 will soon cost 27x after June 1. So you'll get roughly about 140 or so requests a month of opus if my math is correct (3900 AI credits/mo. ÷ 27)?

But if we pay as we go, with a large project will that not cost shit load of $$. I can use gpt 5.3 codex aswell but worried that pay as you go will cost thousands of $ vs 1500 premium request

But if we pay as we go, with a large project will that not cost shit load of $$. I can use gpt 5.3 codex aswell but worried that pay as you go will cost thousands of $ vs 1500 premium request

Yes.

But if we pay as we go, with a large project will that not cost shit load of $$. I can use gpt 5.3 codex aswell but worried that pay as you go will cost thousands of $ vs 1500 premium request

Yeah… I think folks are going to be in for a shock when the “usage cost preview” lands in May. If you’re doing agentic coding, where you set an agent on a task with a checklist or plan and then let it run for 10-15 minutes, something like 5.3-codex can easily burn through $10-15 in API credit costs, or if using 5.5 or Opus, think $30-40. Literally a single prompt could eat your entire allotment of “AI Credits”. I’m curious to see how they will handle it if a task isn’t complete. Will they do like Anthropic and stop the agent cold, just failing halfway through, or will they allow the agent to at least finish?

Hi there 👋

Copilot Pro or Pro+ cannot currently be used on the same GitHub account that also has a Copilot Business or Copilot Enterprise seat assigned.

For now we recommend using separate GitHub accounts to keep personal and work usage clearly separated and to help avoid any unintended billing confusion.

That's not what the documentation recommends.

GitHub recommends that you use one personal account for all your work on GitHub.com. With a single personal account, you can contribute to a combination of personal, open source, or professional projects using one identity. Other people can invite the account to contribute to both individual repositories and repositories owned by an organization, and the account can be a member of multiple organizations or enterprises.

The whole way Copilot is billed and managed goes counter to that recommendation.

The fact they openly just agreed that "Yes, it's usage-based but.. if you don't use it, we're going to take your money anyway" is such a POS move.

Hi there,

It should have been mentioned in the FAQ right away.

Valid point, we've added this question into the discussion announcement.

Your unused AI credits will not roll over from month to month. They will reset at the start of each monthly billing cycle.

It is like you expect someone with brain-defect to accept this deal. Bullshit!

@nardobarbosa Are unused AI credits at least applied to other users usage? The answer to that question should be added to the FAQ.

@nardobarbosa Are unused AI credits at least applied to other users usage? The answer to that question should be added to the FAQ.

The linked blog post speaks about "pooling" in the context of business plans, not individual plans. The way I get that is - during the month - there's a pool of credits that can be used by many users, whether high-usage ones or low-usage ones. Not sure if that's what you're referring to.

believe me 10 USD credit, you may even finish in a day and with one request. this is truelly so bad.

I was also thinking that it has been mentioned that a new billing tool will be available at the beginning of May. That should show your hypothetical spending in past months, would the usage-based billing already have been in place.

I might just unsubscribe because of this very reason! Copilot was the only sensible package provider, but seems they want to follow in others footsteps! Maybe the change might be better, but removing free models. I am out!
Why pay for multiple different subscriptions, if only advantage present is removed.

I was always saying that the problem with other AI is that in the middle of a project you run out of credits and don’t even get code completion.
I have the free tier at work and can say that coding assistant still works if you run out of credits. But no chat.
Will it be similar with my personal pro account? Just more credits?

I might just unsubscribe because of this very reason! Copilot was the only sensible package provider, but seems they want to follow in others footsteps! Maybe the change might be better, but removing free models. I am out! Why pay for multiple different subscriptions, if only advantage present is removed.

So what are you using today?

I was relying on gpt-5 mini after the requests were depleted. I already have codex and claude subscriptions. Only kept copilot because of free models. Now I wont need copilot and will move to some other provider which provides fixed number of calls rather than token based usage.
If anyone even provides a basic model which can be used as fallback when premium requests are depleted i would lean towards it.

You can enable budgets on your account and keep working even after your premium requests have depleted (until you hit budget quota you set for yourself). This is how I figured that Pro+ will be more cost efficient for me based on budget I burned beyond normal Pro subscription request allowance.
https://github.com/settings/billing/budgets?utm_source=vscode

This is actually GREAT experience and I always felt sorry for users of other coding agents, who got overcharged beyond what they planned to spend on a single beefy prompt.

Drug dealers should have it so easy right? They didn't tell us when it was subsidized.... classic predatory business practice. Illegal in anti-trust law maybe? who knows - it's bad behavior and they knew it.

It’s better to use another AI. I had a project where I already paid $300 and still needed almost 25% more, which was stressful. But with another AI that costs only $20 a month for unlimited use, it’s been more helpful and a better experience using this AI app.

Excuse me, but this seems a little bit overwhelming… could you give us a hand😭

Where did you get this information?

@stan661 Go to the Copilot settings and click on Billing & Licensing. You will see a pop-up saying GitHub Copilot is moving to AI credits. Click Preview and upload the CSV file.

@stan661 Go to the Copilot settings and click on Billing & Licensing. You will see a pop-up saying GitHub Copilot is moving to AI credits. Click Preview and upload the CSV file.

Thank you!

I would echo this sentiment quite strongly. I'm told by support that user-level quotas won't be available until June 1, but June 1 is when this all goes live, so I'm staring down the barrel of explosive charges simply because I can't read about nor enable user-quotas prior to the change taking affect. Additionally, support is telling me they can't even talk about it because it's not out yet.

I appreciate the need to cover costs, but this feels extremely rushed with missing documentation to help us understand how to navigate this change appropriately without incurring massive expense. I'm one voice and realize what that means, but delaying this until July 1 and having tooling available prior would go a long way for us.

Classic bait and switch.

Way to listen to your users Copilot Product Managers! Not only was a fairly simple request to not show so many "Upgrade" notifications everywhere ignored but some PM who probably doesn't even use VSCode decided 1 Upgrade distraction wasn't enough, now it's in your face every second. How crazy do you have to be think that showing this stuff constantly will somehow encourage upgrades? You are just going to piss off a lot of people for nothing. There's no way I am "Upgrading" simply because of crap like this. This just encourages me to look for alternatives even though I like VSCode. I'll see how June shapes up but by the look of it Zed + OpenCode it is.

I've never seen a product go downhill this fast before. Apple with the Liquid Glass bullshit and you guys are competing for top enshittification of existing software prize this year. Where's the AI god when you need him? It's time to go from AI agents writing code to AI agents actually making the decisions cause VScode product managers are not up to the job.

If anybody wants to get rid of the latest screaming "Upgrade" UI around the chatbox, downgrading to vscode 1.118.1 seems to do the trick. Downgraded, disabled updates, seems OK so far. Do NOT update to the latest vscode.