Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

@roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Jul 25, 2014

Proposed fix for bug #179

@franciscojunior, you commented out a section of NpgsqlCommandBuilder a while ago as a fix for pgfoundry bug 1010973, but I'm pretty sure that broke the command builder standard behavior...

Can you please take a look at my fix and say what you think?

roji added 2 commits July 25, 2014 13:15
CommandBuilder wasn't properly registering to its DataAdapter
events, resulting in bug npgsql#179
@franciscojunior
Copy link
Member

@franciscojunior, you commented out a section of NpgsqlCommandBuilder a while ago as a fix for pgfoundry bug 1010973, but I'm pretty sure that broke the command builder standard behavior...

I think you are right. As I didn't have a build server and a the test suite in a good shape, I think I inadvertently added that regression. Thanks for heads up and patch!

I'll have a look at it.

@franciscojunior
Copy link
Member

I think your code is very good!

DataAdapter and related CommandBuilder are, to me, one of the most complex classes because at the time I started to work on it, I didn't know how it would interact with .net system.

I'm glad you could grok that interaction and fix this annoying bug!

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Jul 26, 2014

Thanks for the review @franciscojunior, I'm merging.

roji added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2014
Fix CommandBuilder event registration
@roji roji merged commit 66a7bc9 into npgsql:master Jul 26, 2014
@roji roji added the bug label Jul 26, 2014
@roji roji self-assigned this Jul 26, 2014
@roji roji added this to the 2.3 milestone Jul 26, 2014
@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Jul 26, 2014

@franciscojunior, I think it's a good idea to merge this into the 2.2 release?

@franciscojunior
Copy link
Member

Em 26/07/2014 05:06, "Shay Rojansky" notifications@github.com escreveu:

@franciscojunior, I think it's a good idea to merge this into the 2.2
release?

Sure!
I'm on it!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@roji roji modified the milestones: 2.2, 2.3 Jul 26, 2014
roji added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2014
(cherry picked from commit bee2709)

(From #294)
roji added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2014
CommandBuilder wasn't properly registering to its DataAdapter
events, resulting in bug #179

(cherry picked from commit 9940744)

(From #294)
@franciscojunior
Copy link
Member

Applied the patch to release-2.2.0 branch. I had to cherry-pick them because the parent of the pr-294 branch was different and was bringing other commits. But I added all the relevant references.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Jul 26, 2014

OK, great @franciscojunior, thanks! I think cherry-picking like you did is the only way to go in this situation.

@franciscojunior
Copy link
Member

Great!

I'm glad to hear I got it right.

Thank you too, @roji, for all the help and tips about git. :)

@roji roji deleted the bug179 branch October 12, 2014 22:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.