src: unbreak build when compiling against uclibc #8308
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
LGTM |
Member
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/4810/ |
Member
|
LGTM |
It seems that it is possible with some toolchains for both `__GLIBC__` and `__UCLIBC__` to be defined, confusing our "do we have execinfo.h?" logic. Assume that when `__UCLIBC__` is defined, we are dealing with a libc that does not have execinfo.h. Fixes: nodejs#8233 PR-URL: nodejs#8308 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Closed
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
to Fishrock123/node
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2016
It seems that it is possible with some toolchains for both `__GLIBC__` and `__UCLIBC__` to be defined, confusing our "do we have execinfo.h?" logic. Assume that when `__UCLIBC__` is defined, we are dealing with a libc that does not have execinfo.h. Fixes: nodejs#8233 PR-URL: nodejs#8308 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Fishrock123
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2016
It seems that it is possible with some toolchains for both `__GLIBC__` and `__UCLIBC__` to be defined, confusing our "do we have execinfo.h?" logic. Assume that when `__UCLIBC__` is defined, we are dealing with a libc that does not have execinfo.h. Fixes: #8233 PR-URL: #8308 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Contributor
|
@bnoordhuis backport to v4? |
Member
Author
|
Yes. |
Contributor
|
@bnoordhuis |
Member
Author
|
Sorry, it depends on #6734 which is tagged but not back-ported yet. I don't know if or when I'll get around to that. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It seems that it is possible with some toolchains for both
__GLIBC__and
__UCLIBC__to be defined, confusing our "do we have execinfo.h?"logic.
Assume that when
__UCLIBC__is defined, we are dealing with a libcthat does not have execinfo.h.
Fixes: #8233