Commit f623d5d
doc: use _code name_ rather than _codename_
This is excrutiatingly minor, but every authoritative resource I've
checked (which is to say, a few dictionaries) uses "code name" primarily
or exclusively. Let's follow suit.
PR-URL: #36611
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <midawson@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>1 parent 6e338da commit f623d5dCopy full SHA for f623d5d
File tree
Expand file treeCollapse file tree
3 files changed
+6
-7
lines changedOpen diff view settings
Filter options
- doc
- api
- guides
Expand file treeCollapse file tree
3 files changed
+6
-7
lines changedOpen diff view settings
Collapse file
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
- Display the source diff
- Display the rich diff
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| ||
53 | 53 | |
54 | 54 | |
55 | 55 | |
56 | | - |
| 56 | + |
57 | 57 | |
58 | 58 | |
59 | 59 | |
|
Collapse file
+3-4Lines changed: 3 additions & 4 deletions
- Display the source diff
- Display the rich diff
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| ||
1782 | 1782 | |
1783 | 1783 | |
1784 | 1784 | |
1785 | | - |
1786 | | - |
1787 | | - |
| 1785 | + |
| 1786 | + |
1788 | 1787 | |
1789 | 1788 | |
1790 | | - |
| 1789 | + |
1791 | 1790 | |
1792 | 1791 | |
1793 | 1792 | |
|
Collapse file
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
- Display the source diff
- Display the rich diff
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| ||
497 | 497 | |
498 | 498 | |
499 | 499 | |
500 | | - |
| 500 | + |
501 | 501 | |
502 | 502 | |
503 | 503 | |
| ||
740 | 740 | |
741 | 741 | |
742 | 742 | |
743 | | - |
| 743 | + |
744 | 744 | |
745 | 745 | |
746 | 746 | |
|
0 commit comments