DOC: Document the behavior of bar() for categorical x data #29511
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The description seems good to me, but should we also have the equivalent under y in the |
In particular, mention the different behavior on duplicates compared to using `tick_label` explicitly. Closes matplotlib#29507.
9ccc0c3 to
3f08f38
Compare
|
Sure. Done. |
rcomer
reviewed
Jan 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: Ruth Comer <10599679+rcomer@users.noreply.github.com>
rcomer
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
meeseeksmachine
pushed a commit
to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2025
… categorical x data
rcomer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2025
…511-on-v3.10.x Backport PR #29511 on branch v3.10.x (DOC: Document the behavior of bar() for categorical x data)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In particular, mention the different behavior on duplicates compared to using
tick_labelexplicitly.Closes #29507.