-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Fix zerolen intersect #16250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix zerolen intersect #16250
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a06d8e9
TST: a 0 length segment does not intersect with all other segments
tacaswell f8181c9
FIX: when iterating through segments skip 0 length segments
tacaswell b3476a8
FIX: 0 length segment intersect
tacaswell 9729ac2
MNT: make local variable const
tacaswell d5ae201
MNT: alternate method of identifying 0 length segments
tacaswell 41fce6b
TST: use pytest.mark.parametrize instead of a for loop
tacaswell ffaf302
API/MNT: re-arrange 0 length segment detection
tacaswell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you're really going to do the check to zero-len both here and in segments_intersect (which seems weird as well, I'd rather not(?)) at least the check should be the same in both places (len < epsilon)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My logic was this:
==
is cheaper==
condition, we will trigger the determinant condition, but the converse is not true.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well you could change the signature of isclose() to just isclose(a, b) and force atol and rtol as constants in the body of the function... I'm not going to block over that though.