Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Don't explicitly add default include paths to Extensions #13064

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Dec 29, 2018

PR Summary

Closes #9737 and makes setupext.py 20% shorter.

Builds on top of #11964; once that PR is merged I'm happy to further split this one into smaller pieces to help review if needed.

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

anntzer commented Feb 27, 2019

rebased now that #11964 is merged.

setupext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
setupext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Mar 1, 2019
setupext.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@tacaswell tacaswell self-requested a review March 11, 2019 19:53
@tacaswell tacaswell merged commit dce1dc3 into matplotlib:master Mar 13, 2019
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
@anntzer anntzer deleted the setupext branch March 13, 2019 14:06
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

attn @sandrotosi @cgohlke @msarahan don't think this will cause you problems, but just flagging this a head of 3.1

jklymak added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2019
…064-on-v3.1.x

Backport PR #13064 on branch v3.1.x (Don't explicitly add default include paths to Extensions)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

setupext should not explicitly add /usr/{,local/}include to the include path
3 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.