You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#28968 introduced new rotation modes "xtick"/"ytick". We've employed them to all our examples, as this rotation setting is superior compared to fiddling with horizontal/verticalalignment. It's "how tick rotation should be".
Proposed solution
Make these the default rotation modes for tick labels.
Technically, this is a breaking change, but I argue it's the better default and the breakage is minor:
If users did not specify alignment, it's changed from "centered" alignment to the "pointing to tick" aligment.
If users have cared to do the "pointing" to tick alignment manually (which is what we were teaching in examples before), their plot will stay the same.
If users have chosen other alignment, they'll need to adapt.
This is a tradeoff between making a reasonable default so that in the future rotated ticks are "just right" and people don't have to do rotation_mode="xtick" explicitly all the time and breaking explicit alignment compatibility for a few rare edge cases.
#28968 introduced new rotation modes "xtick"/"ytick". We've employed them to all our examples, as this rotation setting is superior compared to fiddling with horizontal/verticalalignment. It's "how tick rotation should be".
Proposed solution
Make these the default rotation modes for tick labels.
Technically, this is a breaking change, but I argue it's the better default and the breakage is minor:
This is a tradeoff between making a reasonable default so that in the future rotated ticks are "just right" and people don't have to do
rotation_mode="xtick"explicitly all the time and breaking explicit alignment compatibility for a few rare edge cases.