Replies: 2 comments
-
|
was trying to poke around to fine more in the code, I may be wrong about the meaning of these properties... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
the options argument for the package names is what was correct at the time I tested the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Following the README, it was suggested to use the legacy code generator for java. The following section in the codeGenerators.js file suggestion there is an option to control the generated java code's package name.
{ language: 'java', legacy: 'java', options: '-papiPackage=foo.bar.client.api.v3.1 -ppackageName=foo.bar.client.api.v3.1', extension: /\.java/gi, },I was not able to get this to work. Any insights on the two properties in the options (the difference between the two?) and if they are expected to work?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions