Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Fix race condition during iteration through modules (#139283) #139862

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025

Conversation

nd
Copy link
Contributor

@nd nd commented May 14, 2025

Lock ensures modules don't change during iteration.

@nd nd requested a review from JDevlieghere as a code owner May 14, 2025 09:10
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot llvmbot added the lldb label May 14, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 14, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb

Author: None (nd)

Changes

Lock ensures modules don't change during iteration.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139862.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp (+1)
diff --git a/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp b/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp
index 7f61f8689fb95..485b49aeb64b4 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp
@@ -1510,6 +1510,7 @@ bool Target::IgnoreWatchpointByID(lldb::watch_id_t watch_id,
 }
 
 ModuleSP Target::GetExecutableModule() {
+  std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(m_images.GetMutex());
   // search for the first executable in the module list
   for (size_t i = 0; i < m_images.GetSize(); ++i) {
     ModuleSP module_sp = m_images.GetModuleAtIndex(i);

@@ -1510,6 +1510,7 @@ bool Target::IgnoreWatchpointByID(lldb::watch_id_t watch_id,
}

ModuleSP Target::GetExecutableModule() {
std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(m_images.GetMutex());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's use the Modules() iterable which allows us to use a for-based loop and does the locking for us:

  // Search for the first executable in the module list.
  for (ModuleSP module_sp : m_images.Modules()) {
    lldb_private::ObjectFile *obj = module_sp->GetObjectFile();

Use of ModuleIterable ensures modules don't change during iteration.
Copy link
Member

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@nd
Copy link
Contributor Author

nd commented May 16, 2025

Sorry, I haven't read the LLVM GitHub user guide before submitting the PR and didn't realize that force pushes are to be avoided.

Please let me know if I need to rework the request somehow.

@labath
Copy link
Collaborator

labath commented May 16, 2025

This is a simple PR, so it's not an issue. The patch gets squashed&rebased anyway. The problem is that with complex, long-running reviews, force-pushes tend to lose all of the comments on the PR.

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere merged commit c72c0b2 into llvm:main May 16, 2025
10 checks passed
Copy link

@nd Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.