-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40.6k
sched: Apply EnablePlugins to CoreResourceEnqueueTestCases #130052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: utam0k The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: utam0k <k0ma@utam0k.jp>
682d2ad
to
2bb5aad
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce |
// This Pod doesn't have any label so that this PodAffinity doesn't match this Pod itself. | ||
st.MakePod().Name("pod4").PodAffinityExists("affinity1", "region", st.PodAffinityWithRequiredReq).NodeAffinityIn("group", []string{"b"}, st.NodeSelectorTypeMatchExpressions).Container("image").Obj(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should keep this pod. It's important to test this case
Looking good except one comment |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/sig-scheduling
What this PR does / why we need it:
All of the test cases for QHint are run with the specified plugins. To keep things simple, I tried to simply apply
EnablePlugins
and pass the existing test cases in this PR. However, I realized that some test cases may need improvement, so I'd like to try them in another PR.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
ref: #127224 (comment)
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: