Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Fix HPA controller assuming terminated pods have a 100% utilization #129868

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
Loading
from

Conversation

jm-franc
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR ensures that terminated pods are ignored by the HPA logic. Currently only pods that terminated on failures are handled, this PR ensures that pods that terminated normally also are.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #129866

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @jm-franc!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/kubernetes 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/kubernetes has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jm-franc. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Jan 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 28, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jm-franc
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mwielgus for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jm-franc
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @adrianmoisey

Comment on lines +383 to +384
podTerminated := pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodFailed || pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodSucceeded
if pod.DeletionTimestamp != nil || podTerminated {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be a comment is needed here?

Suggested change
podTerminated := pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodFailed || pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodSucceeded
if pod.DeletionTimestamp != nil || podTerminated {
// Deleted or terminated Pods are ignored
podTerminated := pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodFailed || pod.Status.Phase == v1.PodSucceeded
if pod.DeletionTimestamp != nil || podTerminated {

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

@jm-franc you happy to push this forward?
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 8, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jm-franc: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-unit 39c90ec link true /test pull-kubernetes-unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jm-franc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jm-franc you happy to push this forward?

Thanks Adrian. I am, I'm swamped atm but I'll come back to this asap. (The existing test needs to be fixed, it should fail if the autoscaling logic is changed but doesn't.)

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

Thanks Adrian. I am, I'm swamped atm but I'll come back to this asap. (The existing test needs to be fixed, it should fail if the autoscaling logic is changed but doesn't.)

Good to know! Just thought I'd check in to see if it needs to be pushed forward.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 11, 2025
@jm-franc
Copy link
Contributor Author

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/autoscaling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Autoscaling. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Needs Triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

HPA wrongly assumes that terminated pods have an utilization of 100%
4 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.