feat(openstack): add support for defining multiple networks#1950
feat(openstack): add support for defining multiple networks#1950kubermatic-bot merged 6 commits intokubermatic:mainkubermatic/machine-controller:mainfrom syphernl:feat/openstack_multiple_networkssyphernl/kubermatic-machine-controller:feat/openstack_multiple_networksCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
|
Hi @syphernl. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubermatic member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Signed-off-by: Frank Klaassen <639906+syphernl@users.noreply.github.com>
da47b7b to
4f131f5
Compare
|
I have tested the functionality of this with the following scenarios:
In all of the above situations the machine is created/configured as expected. |
|
This is ready for tests / review. |
Signed-off-by: Frank Klaassen <639906+syphernl@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/retest-required |
|
/cc |
Signed-off-by: Frank Klaassen <639906+syphernl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Frank <639906+syphernl@users.noreply.github.com>
|
I have tested the functionality of this on our OpenStack environment with the following scenarios:
In all of the above scenarios the machine is created/configured as expected with 1 or multiple (floating) IP's. |
|
/lgtm |
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 4e98f7c2042316c544c29cc10854ae979fbcf7cf |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kron4eg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@syphernl thank you very much for your contribution! |
|
@kron4eg Thanks for the feedback and review. Is there any specific release cycle when this change will be included? |
|
@syphernl no, but we try to pack some changes together in order to have a meaningful release. |
Thanks! Really looking forward to seeing this functionality included as it’s something we need for an ongoing project. It will probably also require an update of the version reference in KubeOne. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #263
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change? Then add your Release Note here:
Documentation: