Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

@bgotink
Copy link
Member

@bgotink bgotink commented Feb 19, 2025

The values() and props() accessors were only mentioned in the grammaer, with no explanation whatsoever about what they were supposed to do.

The val() accessor required an argument in the grammar while the prose repeatedly mentions val() as equivalent to val(0).

This was mentioned in #489. The other changes proposed in that issue are a bit more impactful (rename val() to arg(), introduce negation syntax, introduce equivalent to CSS :is()) so I wanted to get this one out of the way first.

The values() and props() accessors were only mentioned in the
grammaer, with no explanation whatsoever about what they were
supposed to do.

The val() accessor required an argument in the grammar while
the prose repeatedly mentions val() as equivalent to val(0).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.