Replies: 3 comments · 3 replies
-
|
You can run a separate |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ty for your hint! That's already what I do, but some code invoked in the testsclass may call exit. Whereas on ant, it's not an issue when using I guess I'll have to use ant then ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yes, I think that's the only viable option as of now. Java's |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I wonder, if JUnit's Console Launcher could register a shutdown hook via Runtime::addShutdownHook and perform "manouvers of the final moment", such as to close contexts, write reports, free resources, ... and be good? 🤔 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It would probably improve the experience somewhat but it would have to make sure to synthesize finish events for tests that have been started etc. in order to produce non-broken reports. It's certainly doable but would be quite involved as well. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If I understood https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8199704 correctly, there won't be a new API for catching System::exit |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have a bunch of "tests vintages" that need to run in parallel to optimize the execution time.
Our environment is a little complicated. The simplest solution is to use the junit console. but some test class really needs to be executed in a forked jvm.
It's possible to run test classes in forked jvm via
ant junitandmaven surefirebut didn't found a way viajunit console standalone.Is there a way to run the tests in a separate JVM using the console ?
sources
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions