Add tests for slash slash in String literal#32
Open
fadend wants to merge 1 commit intojbfaden:mainjbfaden/JavaJythonConverter:mainfrom
fadend:slash_slash_in_stringfadend/JavaJythonConverter:slash_slash_in_stringCopy head branch name to clipboard
Open
Add tests for slash slash in String literal#32fadend wants to merge 1 commit intojbfaden:mainjbfaden/JavaJythonConverter:mainfrom fadend:slash_slash_in_stringfadend/JavaJythonConverter:slash_slash_in_stringCopy head branch name to clipboard
fadend wants to merge 1 commit intojbfaden:mainjbfaden/JavaJythonConverter:mainfrom
fadend:slash_slash_in_stringfadend/JavaJythonConverter:slash_slash_in_stringCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There may be a problem with slash slash in String literals getting interpreted as comments. These test cases were added in pursuit of finding that problem. While they failed to do that, they do cover some new ground in terms of the parts of the language covered so it seems worthwhile to keep them.
See #23 (comment) for some discussion.