-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
perf: Join op discards child ordering in unordered mode #923
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ac805ce
perf: Concat and Join ops don't compute child ordering in partial ord…
TrevorBergeron 5f95bea
Merge remote-tracking branch 'github/main' into less_order
TrevorBergeron b9029f0
revert concat order loosening
TrevorBergeron a789065
add comment explaining join order in compile
TrevorBergeron 0b1ce61
Merge remote-tracking branch 'github/main' into less_order
TrevorBergeron a5dfb24
Merge branch 'main' into less_order
TrevorBergeron 842ddd3
Merge branch 'main' into less_order
TrevorBergeron 4a18788
Merge branch 'main' into less_order
TrevorBergeron File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious if wee need to do anything to handle
sort=True
behavior from the pandas join? I'm guessing "no", as I suspect this would be implemented as a sort after the join.Also, let's add a comment explaining this optimization:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And yes,
sort=True
sorts as an additional operation and so will still apply: https://github.com/googleapis/python-bigquery-dataframes/blob/main/bigframes/core/blocks.py#L2073-L2080