Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

QL: add restrictive transitive closure query #8411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
Loading
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
52 changes: 52 additions & 0 deletions 52 ql/ql/src/queries/bugs/RestrictiveClosure.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
/**
* @name Restrictive transitive closure
* @description The transitive closure operation might restrict the type even when taking zero steps.
* @kind problem
* @problem.severity warning
* @id ql/restrictive-transitive-closure
* @tags correctness
* maintainability
* @precision high
*/

import ql

Class base(Call c) {
result = c.(MemberCall).getBase().getType().getDeclaration()
or
not c instanceof MemberCall and
result = c.getTarget().(ClassPredicate).getParent()
}

Call closureCall() { result.isClosure("*") }

Class return(Call c) { result = c.getTarget().getReturnType().getDeclaration() }

Class superClass(Class c) { result = c.getASuperType().getResolvedType().getDeclaration() }

from Call c, Class return, Class base
where
c = closureCall() and
return = return(c) and
base = base(c) and
// We aren't restricted anyway from the surrounding code.
not superClass*(base) = return and
tausbn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
not exists(InstanceOf inst |
inst.getExpr() = c and
superClass*(inst.getType().getResolvedType().getDeclaration()) = return
) and
not exists(ComparisonFormula comp, Expr operand | comp.getOperator() = "=" |
comp.getAnOperand() = c and
operand != c and
operand = comp.getAnOperand() and
superClass*(operand.getType().getDeclaration()) = return
) and
// If the result is used in a call, then we only flag if the "closure in the middle" could be removed.
forall(MemberCall memberCall | memberCall.getBase() = c |
exists(ClassPredicate pred |
pred = superClass*(base).getClassPredicate(memberCall.getMemberName()) and
memberCall.getNumberOfArguments() = pred.getArity()
)
)
select c, "Closure restricts type from $@ to $@, even when taking zero steps", base, base.getName(),
return, return.getName()
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.