-
|
One of the examples on the playground is which is very sleek and elegant. However, what would be even more convenient is Is there anything I'm missing to make this work? There's but now you're losing type-safety, I suppose. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment · 3 replies
-
|
In Expr, pipes designed to always work with function. Expr parser checks if there is a function call after a pipe. This approach simplifies a lot of things and makes syntax consistent. One way to solve it is to use variables. let user = tweets | find(.Content contains "Hello");
user.UserThe |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you for the swift response! That's a reasonable workaround 👍 For what it's worth, I don't know if it's worth considering, but maybe - given the constraint you outlined - a new function like Just throwing it out there :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Nice idea actually. Only a few coronal cases which need to be understood. get(.User.Name)
get(.Func())
get(.Math + 42)
get(42) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'd disallow anything that isn't a membership operation (ie the first line), to be honest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
In Expr, pipes designed to always work with function. Expr parser checks if there is a function call after a pipe. This approach simplifies a lot of things and makes syntax consistent.
One way to solve it is to use variables.
The
getbuilt-in keep it's type information. It's a special built-in and have a special handling in type check.