Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

gearonixx
Copy link
Contributor

closes #117

Added this rule to the future preset

@igorkamyshev
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution 😇 I'll take a look this week.

Copy link
Member

@igorkamyshev igorkamyshev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add documentation for the rule? All other stuff is great, I'll merge it as soon as the documentation is done.

@gearonixx
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added

@igorkamyshev
Copy link
Member

Added

Sorry, as a maintainer, I have to be mean. The current version of documentation does not explain anything. Why does this rule exist? Why is .on bad?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rule: no-on

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.