Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

georglauterbach
Copy link
Member

@georglauterbach georglauterbach commented Mar 22, 2024

Description

I came across this visualization recently and found it neat; it gives users an idea of how well this project is actually maintained, and it looks nice. It's not something super important; if you think it does not fit well into the project, or you have other good reasons to reject it, please let me know - I don't mind seeing this rejected, just wanted to bring it up.

Under the hood, we're using Axiom.


Here is the link to the branch: https://github.com/docker-mailserver/docker-mailserver/tree/git-statistics

Here is what it looks like:

git_stats

Type of change

  • This change is a documentation update

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

I came across this visualization recently and found it neat; it gives users an idea of how well this project is actually maintained and it looks nice.
@georglauterbach georglauterbach added kind/improvement Improve an existing feature, configuration file or the documentation area/documentation labels Mar 22, 2024
@georglauterbach georglauterbach self-assigned this Mar 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@polarathene polarathene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think most of that is already presented by the repo "Insights" tab? This is just a nicer visual summary?

I'm fine with it, but I don't know if it provides much value to users in the README 🤷‍♂️

@georglauterbach
Copy link
Member Author

It's nothing completely new, indeed, just a nice visual presentation.

@casperklein
Copy link
Member

I am not sure if these stats are correct. I noticed the top contributors jpsanchezl10 and UltraCoderRU. jpsanchezl10 opened an issue in 2023 and for UltraCoderRU I couldn't find anything at all. Do I miss something here?

@polarathene
Copy link
Member

polarathene commented Mar 23, 2024

UltraCoderRU I couldn't find anything at all

The CONTRIBUTORS.md isn't too helpful at times with how sort order shuffles between updates 🤷‍♂️

The user was listed in the file though, and searching for them on PR history with author:UltraCoderRU does provide this:

No PRs for jpsanchezl10, only 3 issues raised.


image

So yeah that is odd and misleading.

I personally don't find value in the metric, similar to how commit frequency / size doesn't convey much (since before we adopted squash merge for PRs that was a common factor for "top" contributors ranking in the past).

@georglauterbach
Copy link
Member Author

That's odd, I agree. I don't like when something like this is there right from the start.

@georglauterbach georglauterbach deleted the git-statistics branch March 24, 2024 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/documentation kind/improvement Improve an existing feature, configuration file or the documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.