You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was working on a project somewhat similar to this - https://github.com/Aidan-McNay/scarf/tree/main (aiming for tools like a linter/formatter, but starting with a parser). I opted to start my own rather than contributing for a couple reasons, largely creative ownership and some slightly different design decisions, although sv-parser looks great in its own right! When writing this, while no code was ever copied or re-used from sv-parser, I had looked at the code before and had exposure, and am not sure whether this qualifies it as a derivative work.
I'm currently figuring out under which license I want to use the code, but it will likely be LGPL or something similar. I believe this is in-line with the current licenses (being less permissive) even if the code is considered a derivative. Regardless, I wanted to have an open conversation and get your thoughts before making any independent conclusions
Hi!
I was working on a project somewhat similar to this - https://github.com/Aidan-McNay/scarf/tree/main (aiming for tools like a linter/formatter, but starting with a parser). I opted to start my own rather than contributing for a couple reasons, largely creative ownership and some slightly different design decisions, although sv-parser looks great in its own right! When writing this, while no code was ever copied or re-used from sv-parser, I had looked at the code before and had exposure, and am not sure whether this qualifies it as a derivative work.
I'm currently figuring out under which license I want to use the code, but it will likely be LGPL or something similar. I believe this is in-line with the current licenses (being less permissive) even if the code is considered a derivative. Regardless, I wanted to have an open conversation and get your thoughts before making any independent conclusions