Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings

bump: version upgrade #329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
pranalidhanavade merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2025
Merged

bump: version upgrade #329

pranalidhanavade merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2025
+1 −1

Conversation

@pranalidhanavade
Copy link
Contributor

@pranalidhanavade pranalidhanavade commented Nov 13, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What

  • bump: version upgrade

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Version updated to 2.1.3

@pranalidhanavade
bump: version upgrade
7d499ca 
Signed-off-by: pranalidhanavade <pranali.dhanavade@ayanworks.com>
@pranalidhanavade pranalidhanavade self-assigned this Nov 13, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The package version in package.json is bumped from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3, representing a patch-level release. No functional code, configuration, or dependency changes are included in this update.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Version Bump
package.json		 Update version field from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sairanjit

Poem

🐰 A version hops forth, from two-one-two to three,
A patch-level dance, for all code to see,
No logic was harmed in this tiny update,
Just numbers aligned, the release looks great! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'bump: version upgrade' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terms that don't clearly convey which version was bumped or why. Use a more specific title like 'Bump package version from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3' to clearly indicate the version change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/bump-up-version
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d8e194 and 7d499ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

5-5: Version bump looks good.

The patch-level version bump from 2.1.2 to 2.1.3 follows semantic versioning correctly and is appropriate for a maintenance release. Verify that any lock files (package-lock.json or yarn.lock) have also been updated to maintain consistency.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@pranalidhanavade pranalidhanavade merged commit a8165c4 into main Nov 13, 2025
9 checks passed
@GHkrishna GHkrishna deleted the chore/bump-up-version branch November 13, 2025 11:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@GHkrishna GHkrishna GHkrishna approved these changes

Assignees

@pranalidhanavade pranalidhanavade

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@pranalidhanavade @GHkrishna
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.