Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Abolish the term "converting constructor" #6744

Copy link
Copy link
Open
@t3nsor

Description

@t3nsor
Issue body actions

The standard defines the term "converting constructor" to mean any non-explicit constructor, while the C++ community generally uses "converting constructor" to mean a non-explicit constructor that takes a single argument that is not a copy or move constructor. This discrepancy is unfortunate. Therefore I propose to replace all uses of "converting constructor" in the standard by "non-explicit constructor".

PR: #6743

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.