Open
Description
The standard defines the term "converting constructor" to mean any non-explicit constructor, while the C++ community generally uses "converting constructor" to mean a non-explicit constructor that takes a single argument that is not a copy or move constructor. This discrepancy is unfortunate. Therefore I propose to replace all uses of "converting constructor" in the standard by "non-explicit constructor".
PR: #6743
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels