feat: added support for transaction receipt on contract invocation (PSDK-44) #375
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🟡 Heimdall Review Status
|
rohan-agarwal-coinbase
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed? Why?
This change will add transaction receipts to contract invocations. After invoking a contract method, this new change will fetch the transaction receipt of the completed transaction and append the receipt contents, within the "content" field of the Transaction model for the Contract Invocation.
Qualified Impact
If there is any issue with this change, the best measure would be to rollback and then fix the error accordingly. This change will affect the content field which is a part of the Transaction model for the Contract Invocation, but there shouldn't be any issues with the structure of model, since there is no strict validation, and the schema on the backend directly matches the Transaction objects' fields.