Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings
Discussion options

There's a testlib sub-library which is basically a replacement for qtest. It's not inline, but it tries to make it as easy as possible to write more tests (e.g t_list.ml), so the statements are similar to qtest's, with a mix of unit tests and random tests.

I'm finding myself adding it to other projects to get rid of qtest, so maybe it should just be a fixture of containers? or a package containers-testlib perhaps?

I'd love to hear people's opinions on that.

You must be logged in to vote

Replies: 0 comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
💡
Ideas
Labels
None yet
1 participant
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.