Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

[PM-21713] Include CipherId and find Ciphers in Risk Insights report #14823

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

voommen-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-21713

📔 Objective

The original code included the actual ciphers. This was incorrect. Each line item in the Risk Insights report is an aggregation and could consist of many ciphers.
This PR fixes the issue by storing the cipher ids along with the report.
The PR then finds the ciphers and uses it to render the Icons for each line item.

📸 Screenshots

No change to the UI - all UI elements must work as expected.
image

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@voommen-livefront voommen-livefront requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 14:28
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 16, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details80ec6328-7997-4852-a847-e1723f66b55e

Great job, no security vulnerabilities found in this Pull Request

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.57143% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.82%. Comparing base (dcd6f7a) to head (3aa88a0).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../access-intelligence/all-applications.component.ts 0.00% 13 Missing ⚠️
...ss-intelligence/critical-applications.component.ts 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
...-insights/services/risk-insights-report.service.ts 16.66% 5 Missing ⚠️
...ts/risk-insights/services/critical-apps.service.ts 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #14823      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.81%   36.82%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        3199     3200       +1     
  Lines       92625    92727     +102     
  Branches    13906    13927      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits        34101    34148      +47     
- Misses      57118    57172      +54     
- Partials     1406     1407       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

ttalty
ttalty previously approved these changes May 16, 2025
@ttalty ttalty added the needs-qa Marks a PR as requiring QA approval label May 29, 2025
ttalty
ttalty previously approved these changes Jun 2, 2025
ttalty
ttalty previously approved these changes Jun 4, 2025
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 4, 2025

@voommen-livefront voommen-livefront removed the needs-qa Marks a PR as requiring QA approval label Jun 4, 2025
@voommen-livefront voommen-livefront merged commit 0032d14 into main Jun 4, 2025
58 of 59 checks passed
@voommen-livefront voommen-livefront deleted the dirt/pm-21713/include-cipherids branch June 4, 2025 19:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.