-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
exposed internal id as a part of auto increment id #9713
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 1.6.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
exposed internal id as a part of auto increment id #9713
Conversation
* updated test cases regarding internal id
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Security Scan Results for PRDocker Image Scan Results
Source Code Scan Results🎉 No vulnerabilities found! |
As-is this poses a bit of security threat. We should instead disallow querying/sorting/filtering on the internal ID, and only return it in the response model. To do that, we should add an extension of this class in here, and remove |
What does this PR do?
Test Plan
Updated existing test cases to check internal id is getting returned or not
Related PRs and Issues
Checklist