-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
[fix](nereids) fix compare with date like literal #45382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
starocean999
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
yujun777:fix-compare-with-date-like
Dec 18, 2024
Merged
[fix](nereids) fix compare with date like literal #45382
starocean999
merged 1 commit into
apache:master
from
yujun777:fix-compare-with-date-like
Dec 18, 2024
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Please clearly describe your PR:
|
run buildall |
morrySnow
previously approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
starocean999
previously approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
78b8633
run buildall |
78b8633
to
afed6e6
Compare
run buildall |
starocean999
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
morrySnow
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2024
This was referenced Dec 18, 2024
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
starocean999
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2024
16 tasks
englefly
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #45382 Problem Summary: #45382 had fix compare date/datev1 with datetime literal wrong cutting. but it not fix completely. ``` if (right instanceof DateTimeLiteral) { DateTimeLiteral dateTimeLiteral = (DateTimeLiteral) right; right = migrateToDateV2(dateTimeLiteral); if (dateTimeLiteral.getHour() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getMinute() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getSecond() != 0) { ... } } ``` For the above code, if check right is date time literal, but notice that datetimev2 literal is datetime literal's child class. so datetimev2 literal will also run the above code. And datetimev2 literal should check its microseconds not equals to 0. for example: `date_a = '2020-01-01 00:00:00.01'` should opt as `FALSE`, but not `date_a = '2020-01-01'`.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #45382 Problem Summary: #45382 had fix compare date/datev1 with datetime literal wrong cutting. but it not fix completely. ``` if (right instanceof DateTimeLiteral) { DateTimeLiteral dateTimeLiteral = (DateTimeLiteral) right; right = migrateToDateV2(dateTimeLiteral); if (dateTimeLiteral.getHour() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getMinute() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getSecond() != 0) { ... } } ``` For the above code, if check right is date time literal, but notice that datetimev2 literal is datetime literal's child class. so datetimev2 literal will also run the above code. And datetimev2 literal should check its microseconds not equals to 0. for example: `date_a = '2020-01-01 00:00:00.01'` should opt as `FALSE`, but not `date_a = '2020-01-01'`.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
### What problem does this PR solve? Issue Number: close #xxx Related PR: #45382 Problem Summary: #45382 had fix compare date/datev1 with datetime literal wrong cutting. but it not fix completely. ``` if (right instanceof DateTimeLiteral) { DateTimeLiteral dateTimeLiteral = (DateTimeLiteral) right; right = migrateToDateV2(dateTimeLiteral); if (dateTimeLiteral.getHour() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getMinute() != 0 || dateTimeLiteral.getSecond() != 0) { ... } } ``` For the above code, if check right is date time literal, but notice that datetimev2 literal is datetime literal's child class. so datetimev2 literal will also run the above code. And datetimev2 literal should check its microseconds not equals to 0. for example: `date_a = '2020-01-01 00:00:00.01'` should opt as `FALSE`, but not `date_a = '2020-01-01'`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer.
dev/2.1.8-merged
dev/3.0.4-merged
p0_w
reviewed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #xxx
Related PR: #xxx
Problem Summary:
when compare with date like literal, the literal may be wrong cut.
for example:
if a is datetimev1, then:
a = '2020-01-01 00:00:00.12'
should opt asFALSE
, but it opt asa = '2020-01-01 00:00:00
;a >= '2020-01-01 00:00:00.12'
should opt asa >= '2020-01-01 00:00:01
, but it opt asa >= '2020-01-01 00:00:00
;if a is date / datev2, then:
a = '2020-01-01 00:00:12'
should opt asFALSE
, but it don't opt it;Release note
None
Check List (For Author)
Test
Behavior changed:
Does this need documentation?
Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)