Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Adding docs for CKS cluster autoscaling#167

Closed
davidjumani wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterapache/cloudstack-documentation:masterfrom
shapeblue:cks-autoscalingshapeblue/cloudstack-documentation:cks-autoscalingCopy head branch name to clipboard
Closed

Adding docs for CKS cluster autoscaling#167
davidjumani wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterapache/cloudstack-documentation:masterfrom
shapeblue:cks-autoscalingshapeblue/cloudstack-documentation:cks-autoscalingCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@davidjumani
Copy link
Contributor

@davidjumani
Copy link
Contributor Author

requesting docbuild

@ACSGitBot
Copy link

Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and check the output log for errors.

This shouldn't take long.

@ACSGitBot
Copy link

Build finished. You can review it at: https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr167//

Build Log Output:

No log errors found to report.//

@davidjumani
Copy link
Contributor Author

requesting docbuild

@ACSGitBot
Copy link

Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and check the output log for errors.

This shouldn't take long.

@ACSGitBot
Copy link

Build finished. You can review it at: https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr167//

Build Log Output:

No log errors found to report.//

Details on how the cluster-autoscaler works can be found on the official `Kubernetes cluster autoscaler repository
<https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster-autoscaler/FAQ.md>`_

From 4.16, CloudStack supports automated deployment of the cluster autoscaler for Kubernetes Cluster versions 1.15.0 and higher.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we say v1.16 if 1.15 is not supported?

Copy link
Member

@yadvr yadvr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, minor note added

@davidjumani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Combining with #168

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.