Improvement: SSL offloading with Virtual Router#11468
Improvement: SSL offloading with Virtual Router#11468yadvr merged 16 commits intoapache:mainapache/cloudstack:mainfrom weizhouapache:4.22-ssl-offloadingweizhouapache/cloudstack:4.22-ssl-offloadingCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
e200195 to
e2e6302
Compare
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 14670 |
e2e6302 to
b590b74
Compare
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11468 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 17.36% 17.39% +0.03%
- Complexity 15237 15273 +36
============================================
Files 5888 5888
Lines 525741 526002 +261
Branches 64164 64204 +40
============================================
+ Hits 91274 91496 +222
- Misses 424167 424178 +11
- Partials 10300 10328 +28
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14671 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14689 |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14870 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 14872 |
|
@blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-80u3 |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + vmware-80u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-14225) |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14216)
|
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14217)
|
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14219)
|
|
@blueorangutan test ol8 vmware-80u3 |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + vmware-80u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14236)
|
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14253)
|
@weizhouapache this might be a potential issue, in Marvin logs I see bunch of: |
thanks @borisstoyanov looking into it the failures with |
|
LGTM, merging this based on reviews and QA. |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14315)
|
* SSL offloading with Virtual Router * PR11468: fix pre-commit errors * PR11468: api->getAPI/postAPI in UI * SSL: add smoke tests for VPC in user project * PR11468: address Daan's comments * Fix test/integration/smoke/test_ssl_offloading.py * SSL: remove ssl certificates when clean up account * SSL offloading: add unit tests * SSL offloading: UI fixes part 1 * SSL offloading: UI changes part 2 * SSL offloading: add more unit tests * SSL offloading: more unit tests 3 * SSL offloading: wrong check * SSL offloading: more and more unit tests * SSL offloading: add testUpdateLoadBalancerRule5
manual check looks good |
Description
This PR improves the SSL termination feature to support CloudStack VR
Design doc: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSL+Offloading+with+Virtual+Router
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?