Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Appearance settings

extra null guard #10264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
DaanHoogland merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2025
Merged

extra null guard #10264

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions 4 engine/orchestration/src/main/java/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -586,11 +586,11 @@ protected AgentAttache notifyMonitorsOfConnection(final AgentAttache attache, fi
}
} catch (final HypervisorVersionChangedException hvce) {
handleDisconnectWithoutInvestigation(attache, Event.ShutdownRequested, true, true);
throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to connect " + attache.getId(), hvce);
throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to connect " + (attache == null ? "<unknown agent>" : attache.getId()), hvce);
Copy link
Collaborator

@hsato03 hsato03 Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe use ObjectUtils.defaultIfNull instead of ternary operators?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would not mind , but don't see that this improves robustness or readability @hsato03 . What is your intention/sugestion?

Copy link
Collaborator

@hsato03 hsato03 Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@DaanHoogland the intention was to improve readability, but after reading the code again I realized that the method would not be useful in this situation. Please ignore my suggestion 😅

Copy link
Contributor Author

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland Jan 27, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @hsato03 .

} catch (final Exception e) {
s_logger.error("Monitor " + monitor.second().getClass().getSimpleName() + " says there is an error in the connect process for " + hostId + " due to " + e.getMessage(), e);
handleDisconnectWithoutInvestigation(attache, Event.AgentDisconnected, true, true);
throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to connect " + attache.getId(), e);
throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to connect " + (attache == null ? "<unknown agent>" : attache.getId()), e);
}
}
}
Expand Down
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.