fix(core): markDirty() should only mark flags when really scheduling tick#39316
Closed
JiaLiPassion wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:masterangular/angular:masterfrom
JiaLiPassion:markdirty-coaleascingJiaLiPassion/angular:markdirty-coaleascingCopy head branch name to clipboard
Closed
fix(core): markDirty() should only mark flags when really scheduling tick#39316JiaLiPassion wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:masterangular/angular:masterfrom JiaLiPassion:markdirty-coaleascingJiaLiPassion/angular:markdirty-coaleascingCopy head branch name to clipboard
JiaLiPassion wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:masterangular/angular:masterfrom
JiaLiPassion:markdirty-coaleascingJiaLiPassion/angular:markdirty-coaleascingCopy head branch name to clipboard
Conversation
mhevery
suggested changes
Oct 19, 2020
6184918 to
17fcefb
Compare
9c9d007 to
cb6c1b8
Compare
…tick. Close angular#39296 Fix an issue that `markDirty()` will not trigger change detection. The case is for example we have the following component. ``` export class AppComponent implements OnInit { constructor(private router: Router) {} ngOnInit() { this.router.events .pipe(filter((e) => e instanceof NavigationEnd)) .subscribe(() => ɵmarkDirty(this)); } } export class CounterComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy { ngOnInit() { this.countSubject.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy)).subscribe((count) => { this.count = count; ɵmarkDirty(this); }); } ``` Then the app navigate from `AppComponent` to `CounterComponent`, so there are 2 `markDirty()` call at in a row. The `1st` call is from `AppComponent` when router changed, the `2nd` call is from `CounterComponent.ngOnInit()`. And the `markDirty()->scheduleTick()` code look like this ``` function scheduleTick(rootContext, flags) { const nothingScheduled = rootContext.flags === 0 /* Empty */; rootContext.flags |= flags; if (nothingScheduled && rootContext.clean == _CLEAN_PROMISE) { rootContext.schedule(() => { ... if (rootContext.flags & RootContextFlags.DetectChanges) rootContext.flags &= ~RootContextFlags.DetectChanges; tickContext(); rootContext.clean = _CLEAN_PROMISE; ... }); ``` So in this case, the `1st` markDirty() will 1. set rootContext.flags = 1 2. before `tickContext()`, reset rootContext.flags = 0 3. inside `tickContext()`, it will call `CounterComponent.ngOnint()`, so the `2nd` markDirty() is called. 4. and the `2nd` scheduleTick is called, `nothingScheduled` is true, but rootContext.clean is not `_CLEAN_PROMISE` yet, since the `1st` markDirty tick is still running. 5. So nowhere will reset the `rootContext.flags`. 6. then in the future, any other `markDirty()` call will not trigger the tick, since `nothingScheduled` is always false. So `nothingScheduled` means no tick is scheduled, `rootContext.clean === _CLEAN_PROMISE` means no tick is running. So we should set the flags to `rootContext` only when `no tick is scheudled or running`.
cb6c1b8 to
1a82495
Compare
mhevery
approved these changes
Oct 21, 2020
Contributor
josephperrott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2020
…tick. (#39316) Close #39296 Fix an issue that `markDirty()` will not trigger change detection. The case is for example we have the following component. ``` export class AppComponent implements OnInit { constructor(private router: Router) {} ngOnInit() { this.router.events .pipe(filter((e) => e instanceof NavigationEnd)) .subscribe(() => ɵmarkDirty(this)); } } export class CounterComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy { ngOnInit() { this.countSubject.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy)).subscribe((count) => { this.count = count; ɵmarkDirty(this); }); } ``` Then the app navigate from `AppComponent` to `CounterComponent`, so there are 2 `markDirty()` call at in a row. The `1st` call is from `AppComponent` when router changed, the `2nd` call is from `CounterComponent.ngOnInit()`. And the `markDirty()->scheduleTick()` code look like this ``` function scheduleTick(rootContext, flags) { const nothingScheduled = rootContext.flags === 0 /* Empty */; rootContext.flags |= flags; if (nothingScheduled && rootContext.clean == _CLEAN_PROMISE) { rootContext.schedule(() => { ... if (rootContext.flags & RootContextFlags.DetectChanges) rootContext.flags &= ~RootContextFlags.DetectChanges; tickContext(); rootContext.clean = _CLEAN_PROMISE; ... }); ``` So in this case, the `1st` markDirty() will 1. set rootContext.flags = 1 2. before `tickContext()`, reset rootContext.flags = 0 3. inside `tickContext()`, it will call `CounterComponent.ngOnint()`, so the `2nd` markDirty() is called. 4. and the `2nd` scheduleTick is called, `nothingScheduled` is true, but rootContext.clean is not `_CLEAN_PROMISE` yet, since the `1st` markDirty tick is still running. 5. So nowhere will reset the `rootContext.flags`. 6. then in the future, any other `markDirty()` call will not trigger the tick, since `nothingScheduled` is always false. So `nothingScheduled` means no tick is scheduled, `rootContext.clean === _CLEAN_PROMISE` means no tick is running. So we should set the flags to `rootContext` only when `no tick is scheudled or running`. PR Close #39316
josephperrott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 29, 2020
…tick. (#39316) Close #39296 Fix an issue that `markDirty()` will not trigger change detection. The case is for example we have the following component. ``` export class AppComponent implements OnInit { constructor(private router: Router) {} ngOnInit() { this.router.events .pipe(filter((e) => e instanceof NavigationEnd)) .subscribe(() => ɵmarkDirty(this)); } } export class CounterComponent implements OnInit, OnDestroy { ngOnInit() { this.countSubject.pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy)).subscribe((count) => { this.count = count; ɵmarkDirty(this); }); } ``` Then the app navigate from `AppComponent` to `CounterComponent`, so there are 2 `markDirty()` call at in a row. The `1st` call is from `AppComponent` when router changed, the `2nd` call is from `CounterComponent.ngOnInit()`. And the `markDirty()->scheduleTick()` code look like this ``` function scheduleTick(rootContext, flags) { const nothingScheduled = rootContext.flags === 0 /* Empty */; rootContext.flags |= flags; if (nothingScheduled && rootContext.clean == _CLEAN_PROMISE) { rootContext.schedule(() => { ... if (rootContext.flags & RootContextFlags.DetectChanges) rootContext.flags &= ~RootContextFlags.DetectChanges; tickContext(); rootContext.clean = _CLEAN_PROMISE; ... }); ``` So in this case, the `1st` markDirty() will 1. set rootContext.flags = 1 2. before `tickContext()`, reset rootContext.flags = 0 3. inside `tickContext()`, it will call `CounterComponent.ngOnint()`, so the `2nd` markDirty() is called. 4. and the `2nd` scheduleTick is called, `nothingScheduled` is true, but rootContext.clean is not `_CLEAN_PROMISE` yet, since the `1st` markDirty tick is still running. 5. So nowhere will reset the `rootContext.flags`. 6. then in the future, any other `markDirty()` call will not trigger the tick, since `nothingScheduled` is always false. So `nothingScheduled` means no tick is scheduled, `rootContext.clean === _CLEAN_PROMISE` means no tick is running. So we should set the flags to `rootContext` only when `no tick is scheudled or running`. PR Close #39316
|
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy. This action has been performed automatically by a bot. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Close #39296
Fix an issue that
markDirty()will not trigger change detection.The case is for example we have the following component.
Then the app navigate from
AppComponenttoCounterComponent,so there are 2
markDirty()call at in a row.The
1stcall is fromAppComponentwhen router changed, the2ndcall is fromCounterComponent.ngOnInit().And the
markDirty()->scheduleTick()code look like thisSo in this case, the
1stmarkDirty() willtickContext(), reset rootContext.flags = 0tickContext(), it will callCounterComponent.ngOnint(),so the
2ndmarkDirty() is called.2ndscheduleTick is called,nothingScheduledis true,but rootContext.clean is not
_CLEAN_PROMISEyet, since the1stmarkDirty tickis still running.
rootContext.flags.markDirty()call will not trigger the tick, sincenothingScheduledis always false.So
nothingScheduledmeans no tick is scheduled,rootContext.clean === _CLEAN_PROMISEmeans no tick is running.
So we should set the flags to
rootContextonly whenno tick is scheudled or running.